My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
03-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 1:38:03 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:35:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MARCH 8,1999 <br />(U3) m08 BROOK PARK REALTY, 3760 SHORELINE DRIVE • Continued <br />Moorse responded that a significant amount of the landscaping is to screen the neighbors; <br />however, the residents in the northern units will look down on a large expanse of driveway <br />and the overstory trees are recommended to provide screening for those residents. <br />Kelley said he would not be comfortable approving this application until all of these issues are <br />resolved. <br />Barrett said the structure of the proposal to settle this matter requires that the applicants give <br />up their lawsuit in exchange for the subdivider’s agreement. With respect to the landscaping <br />plan, on page 8, it says that the subdivider shall submit a plan and the plan shall be reviewed <br />by the City ’s consultant and approved by the City Council prior to a certificate of occupancy <br />being issued. Barrett understands that the applicant has agreed to those terms, so the City <br />Council has ultimate control over the disposition of the landscaping plan. <br />Kelley asked what could be done if the City was not in agreement over the landscape plan. <br />Barrett said the City is empowered by the subdivider’s agreement not to issue a certificate of <br />occupancy. <br />Kelley asked if the City could hold up occupancy for sbc months. <br />Barrett said yes, the City has very strong authority with the subdivider’s agreement. <br />Jabbour asked if the City would be justified to complete the landscaping and assess it to the <br />project. <br />Barrett said if the Council is interested in that option, it should be incorporated in the <br />subdivider’s agreement. <br />Gleason said he would like to submit a landscaping plan, get it approved by the City and <br />install the landscaping at the appropriate time. <br />Jabbour would like to broaden the language in the letter of credit or the escrow agreement so <br />the money for the street could be used for the landscaping. <br />Gleason stud he would be securing funds for the landscaping. He feels that when he applies for <br />final plat approval, that is the time to get the landscaping plan approved. <br />Jabbour stud he shares Kelley ’s concerns and he hopes the developer will work with the City <br />to resolve the issues. <br />Page 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.