Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />•3 <br />FEB 2 2 1999 <br />Date: February 18,1999 <br />Item No.: ^ <br />Department Approval: Administrator Approval: <br />Name: Michael P. Gaffron <br />Title: Senior Planning Coordinator <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #2459 Corrections to Ordinance No. 161, 2nd Series -Telecommunication <br />Towers and i Vntennas - Ordinance Adoption <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Ordinance for Adoption <br />B - Planning Commission Memo 1-29-99 <br />C - Ordinance 161,2nd Series <br />Summary <br />Ordinance No. 161,2nd Series, adopted May 27,1997, contained t^\'o minor errore which have come <br />to light as a result of incorporating the ordinance into the appropriate Zoning Code sections. The <br />proposed ordinance is essentially a 'housekeeping' ordinance to make corrections. Specifically: <br />1. The new Accessory Antenna provisions were not incorporated into the B-1 <br />District standards after the old 'antenna structure' and 'antenna' conditional use <br />sections were deleted from B-1. <br />2. Personal Wireless Service Antennas and Towers were intended by Council to only <br />be allowed on municipal structures, i.e. the two Orono water towers. Ordinance 161 <br />intended to allow such use only in the two zoning districts in which the water towers <br />are located, i.e. the RR-IB and LR-IC districts. However, Ordinance 161 <br />inadvertently incorporated this provision into the B-1 district rather than the LR-IC. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance corrections at a public hearing on February <br />16, and voted 4-0 to recommend adoption as presented. No public comments were forthcoming. <br />Planning Commission briefly discussed the fact that accessory antennas have never been specifically <br />allowed in the B-2 or B-5 districts (and still won ’t be after adoption of the corrective ordinance). <br />Planning Commission concluded that is a topic for future discussion, and should not be addressed <br />as part of this merely corrective action at this time.