My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-08-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
02-08-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 1:34:38 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:32:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b. <br />3. <br />c. <br />City can/wll deve’.op a section of road in the triangle (if required by MnDOT in order <br />for turnback to occur) to City specs for 1 or more users, extending to the Otten <br />property for future connection to a continuation of said road when Otten develops. <br />City wall grant an administrative variance to Section 6.05 Subd. 10(D) to allow the <br />access driveway into Service 800 site to be less than.100' from the intersection. <br />Anticipated schedule to complete turnback: <br />60-days minimum for MnDOT staff review <br />possible access permit after staff review <br />additional 30-90-? days to complete turnback process, depending on MnDOT <br />requirements for public road construction <br />Potential Pitfalls: <br />MnDOT staff might find a reason they won't approve a turnback <br />MnDOT may require that the public road must be built and open to public <br />travel before they will allow a turnback <br />FALLBACK OPTION. To satisfy City demand that access be across from Brimhall, <br />Service 800 would be prepared to build a driveway across Otten's property to the northwest <br />comer of the Service 800 site. Although not preferred by staff nor Service 800 nor Otten, this <br />option would be locked in if the turnback and reconveyance options fail to gain MnDOT <br />app. val. To make this option feasible as a viable 'fallback' option: <br />a. <br />b. <br />c. <br />d. <br />Otten would have to grant Service 800 an easement to the northwest comer of their <br />site. <br />Service 800 would have to commit to building this driveway by establishing a letter <br />of credit to cover the costs of driveway construction. <br />Easement and letter of credit could be extinguished at the time Options 1 or 2 happen. <br />City would have the ability to require construction of this driveway by a date certain <br />if Options 1 or 2 ultimately will not happen. <br />Anticipated Schedule: <br />Prior to Sugar Woods 2nd Addition final plat approval (say by Febmary 8, <br />1999) Otten would provide easement to Service 800. <br />Letter of credit required prior to issuance of building permit for Service 800 <br />building <br />MnDOT could/would issue permit for this access in this configuartion at any <br />time. <br />City would require this access be built within 60 days of determination that <br />Options 1 and 2 are not going to happen, or within 1 year of final plat <br />approval if no progress is being made on Options 1 or 2..
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.