My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-08-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
02-08-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 1:34:38 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:32:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 <br />(m) #2450 GLENN QRONBERG, 325 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH • Continued <br />McMillan moved, Lindquist seconded a motion to approve Application #2450 for Glenn <br />Gronberg, 325 North Willow Drive, for a Preliminary Subdivision as modified and presented <br />tonight subject to the staffs recommendations and with the development of a private road <br />and cul-de-sac being based upon the issuance of a building permit for the new lot VOTE: <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#5) #2445 ROBERT GEHRMAN, 4300 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH, VARIANCES, 9:05 p.m. - 9:15 <br />p.nn. <br />Weinberger presented the staff report, he stated that Mr. Gehrman has been issued a building <br />permit to construct a 36' x 77' accessory structure on his property. The accessory structure is located <br />more than 400' back from the road near an existing 20' x 60' accessory building. The maximum <br />allowed accessory structure on a lot larger than 9 acres Is 3,000 square feet. Both accessory <br />structures meet this requirement. The applicant is proposing to connect both structures with a 10' x <br />10' walkway. By connecting the structures, both buildings would be considered one structure which <br />would require a variance for an oversized accessory structure. The total combined square footage of <br />the old and proposed structures would be 4,072 square feet. He reviewed the Zoning Code <br />requirements regarding restrictive covenants that must be placed on the property. He said that the <br />applicant has stated he intends to store antiques in the structure. The Zoning Code does not allow <br />storage of inventory intended for retail purposes. He stated that staff is recommending approval of <br />the application based upon the hardship being that the connection is going to connect two legal <br />buildings and it is in keeping with the rural character of the neighborhood. <br />Robert Gehrman, the applicant, was present. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Stoddard asked what the Zoning Code allows for the maximum size building per acre and the total <br />amount of accessory structure per acre. <br />Weinberger stated that the maximum allowed for this tot would be 6,000 square feet for accessory <br />structures. <br />Stoddard asked the applicant if there are accessory structures located on the property. <br />Gehrman stated the other structures consist of a 20' x 30' garage, a 12' x 16' shed, and a 20' x 20' <br />shed, or approximately 5,200 square feet in total. <br />Schroeder asked if the applicant intends to use the accessory structure for retail purposes. <br />Gehrman said no. <br />Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, a motion to approve Appiication #2445, Robert S. <br />Gehrman, 4300 Sixth Avenue North, for a variance to allow an oversized accessory structure <br />on the property due to the nature of the iot and the combination of the two would still be <br />under the maximum 6,00 square feet allowed for accessory structures. <br />McMillan stated she Is concerned about setting a precedent regarding oversized buildings. <br />Lindquist stated he can approve the application because of the very rural setting. <br />Page 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.