Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 <br />m) #2449 JOHN VOGT/MIKE HILBEUNK, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 3020 WATERTOWN <br />ROAD - Continued <br />Van Zomeren said that the primary issue for staff is the access to the back two lots. This is also an <br />issue to the neighbors. She said that staff recommends that a 50' outlet be platted across the <br />northern end of the parcel and that the temporary cul-de-sac in Crystal Creek be eliminated and a <br />new temporary cul-de-sac be created to serve the proposed two new lots, Lot 7 in Crystal Creek, and <br />the outlet owned by Kingsbridge Properties. <br />Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt were present. They stated they did not receive their copies of the staff <br />report until today. Hilbelink stated they are not proposing to extend the cul-de-sac for access. They <br />wouio prefer a private drive. He stated there is room to make sure there are three acres in both of <br />the rear lots. He said they have no desire to connect Crystal Creek Road to Wear Lane. He stated <br />that most or all of the accessory buildings will be removed. Hilbelink stated he has talked to Mr. <br />Stubbs and there is a possibility of one or two buildable lots on his property. Extension of Wear Lane <br />to Crystal Creek would destroy that possibility. <br />Chair Smith noted that three letters were received regarding the proposal: <br />Steven & Anne Kahler, 35 Crystal Creek Road, dated January 15,1999 <br />Michael & Gayle Sievert, 85 Wear Ln. N., dated January 18,1999 <br />Richard & Joan Scorza, 2850 Wear Circle, dated January 20,1999 <br />John Winston, 155 Wear Lane, stated he is concerned about the linkage of Wear Lane to Crystal <br />Creek Road and he does not want to see that happen. He said that he and his neighbors do not <br />object to the subdivision, they are not in favor of linking Wear Lane to Crystal Creek Road. <br />Hugh Hoffman, 40 Wear Lane North, stated that he agrees with Mr. Winston. <br />Steve Alseth, 3385 Watertown Road, questioned the number of lots. <br />Van Zomeren clarified that this would be a three-lot subdivision. <br />Rick Carlson, Jyland Development, stated he has purchased an option on the remaining lots in <br />Crystal Creek. He supports access through Crystal Creek, but he is not in favor of a through-road to <br />Wear Lane and he does not support a public road. He said that Outlet B is now considered <br />unbuildable. He opposes the 50’ easement on the north to provide access creating a flag lot. He is <br />also concerned about the cost for the private road. There has not been any discussion regarding <br />these new lots contributing to the cost of Crystal Creek Road. <br />Smith asked for Rick Carlson’s opinion on connecting Crystal Creek Road to Wear Lane. <br />Carlson said he feels two more lots on the private road would not be a problem because Crystal <br />Creek Road was constructed to public road standards. He said there would be no gain to Orono in <br />making it a public road. <br />Mark Supalla, 160 Wear Lane, complimented John Vogt on the project and said that he supports the <br />subdivision. <br />Alan Carlson stated that he developed the area of Crystal Creek. He said that he has no objection to <br />the subdivision provided the applicants give up the easement over the north lot to Outlot B. He said <br />that when he developed Crystal Creek, the easement was for access to four lots that he has already <br />had approved. *rhe cul-de-sac was supposed to be temporary until the road was extended to Outlot <br />B. He wants a road developed that would provide access to his lots. <br />Page 5