My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-25-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
01-25-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 2:20:47 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:31:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(ff 1 - #2000 - Cortlen Cloutier - Continued) <br />Schroder moved, Peterson seconded, to table appUcation #2000. Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />^ (#2) #1950 GLENN UPTON, 3685 NORTH SHORE DR^ - VARIANCES <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:53-8:03 P.i I. <br />The Applicant, Mr. Upton, was present. <br />The amended plan is for 192 s.i. of additional Uving space and 484 s.f for an “ached <br />garage The amended proposal is for 52' lakeshore setback, where 75 is required It does <br />Let the minimum DNR re^quired setback of 50'. A hardship list is mcluded as well as a <br />petition from the neighbors which support the second proposal. <br />deeded to him by the county. Schroeder said that this issue does not affect the <br />application. <br />Rowlette informed the applicant of the city ordinance disallowing any boats larger than 20 <br />to be stored outside on a property. <br />Schroeder noted the 68 s.f increase in hardcover in the 0-75' zone with the remainder of <br />the increase in the 75-250' zone. He also noted the attempt by the applicant to rneet as <br />many requirements as he could and the large number of hardships pertaining to the <br />application. <br />Peterson asked about the status of the survey and side setback. It was <br />survey had been updated last year with the filing of the current application. Mabusth and <br />the appUcant confirmed that the side setback requirement was met with 11.3'. <br />Nolan asked if the applicant was willing to remove the shed and other items located in that <br />area, which the applicant said he would. <br />Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve applicant #2950 as amended with the <br />condition that aU hardcover removal be completed prior to construction to mclude shed <br />and miscellaneous items. The access garage could be retained until the proposed attached <br />garage is completed. Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.