Laserfiche WebLink
Hardcover <br />Distance <br />from <br />Shoreline <br />Total Area in <br />Setback <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />Variance Requested <br />0'-75'8,380 s.f.1,751.6 s.f. <br />(20.9%) <br />none <br />(0%) <br />1,897.6 s.f <br />(22.6%) <br />To allow hardcover to <br />increase by 146 s.f <br />75'-250’350 s.f.0 s.f. <br />(0%) <br />87.5 s.f <br />(25%) <br />0 s.f <br />(0%) <br />none <br />250'-500'0 s.f.0 s.f <br />(0%) <br />0 s.f. <br />(0%) <br />0 s.f <br />(0%) <br />none <br />500'-1000'0 0 0 <br />(35%) <br />0 none <br />The £^)plicant has requested an after-the-fact hardcover variance to allow a deck to be located within <br />75' of the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. No improvements have occurred outside of the 0-75' <br />setback. <br />Structural Coverage <br />Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage <br />8,730 s.f Existing: 2,034.75 s.f <br />w/o deck addn.: 1,888.75 s.f <br />23.3% <br />21.6% <br />The deck has increased structural coverage by 146 s.f. The preexisting structure is legal, as the <br />site plan was approved with variances in 1995. <br />ANALYSIS <br />Variance <br />STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP <br />The applicant has included his statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicant should also be <br />asked for his testimony regarding this issue. <br />^24^3 OUnn Upton <br />Sorth Shore Drive <br />Vurtances <br />hI9/99 <br />Page 3