Laserfiche WebLink
F <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: Januiuy 8,1999 <br />ITEM NO.: ^ <br />Department Approval: j. <br />Name Michael P. Gaffron <br />Title Senior Planning Coordinator <br />Adminbtrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #2425 Sid & Barbara Rebers / Jean Mork Bredeson (Service 800, Inc.) <br />Access Issue Discussion - Request for Final Plat Approval - Resolution <br />Application: Conversion of Outlot E, Sugar Woods to buildable lot status. <br />List of Exhibits <br />- Resolution <br />B - Alternate Resolution Conditions Language Suggested by Applicants Attorney <br />C - Final Plat Drawings <br />D - Special Assessment Agreement <br />E - Resolution No. 4182 - Preliminary Plat Resolution <br />F - Subdivision/Building Permit Punchlist 12-7-98 <br />G -1997 MnDot/BRW Communications <br />H - Letter from Long Lake Planner <br />I - Memo of December 10 <br />J - Service 800 Landscape Plan & Otten Landscape Plan <br />K - Revised Site Plan Submitted 1-8-99 <br />L - Easement over Otten property <br />M - MnDOT letter January 8,1999 <br />The applicants have substantially completed (or will complete prior to filing of the plat by the City <br />Attorney) the conditions of Resolution No. 4182 for final pht approval. However, MiiDOT has <br />thrown a curve at the eleventh hour by not approving the pnvx>sed access across from Brimhall <br />Avenue. <br />Highway 12 Access Issue <br />In May 1997 MnDOT reviewed the Sugar Woods 2nd Addition proposed plat and indicated in a <br />letter dated May 8,1997 they would only permit the existing righl-in/right-out curb cut for access <br />to the site. On August 4, 1997 the City was copied on a memo from Wayne Cordes of BRW to <br />Stephen Pflaum, Rebers’ attorney, that indicated he had discussed the concept of an access across <br />from Brimhall in the triangular right-of-way area, and MnDOT had agreed in concept to this. (See <br />Exhibit G) That memo also suggests MnDOT would be amending their May 8 letter, but we never <br />received such an amendment.