Laserfiche WebLink
City ®f ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2649 <br />11. The granting of the required variances would result in <br />the following violations of Section 10.08, Subdivision 3(a) <br />of the Zoning Code with which the applicant must first <br />comply before the requested variances can be granted: <br />a. The granting of the requested variances would <br />appear to serve merely as a convenience to the <br />applicant as there have been no valid hardships <br />demonstrated through the review of this application. <br />b. The granting of the application is not necessary <br />for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial <br />property right of the applicant. <br />c. Granting of the variance will tend to alter the <br />essential character of the locality. <br />d. The property in question can be put to reasonable use <br />under conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />Alternative, low maintenance types of ground cover can be <br />established that will eliminate the applicant's stated <br />safety concerns. <br />Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, <br />on this 26th day of June, 1989. <br />ATTLST : <br />e <br />P -L -7 Y - I •- <br />y M. allin, City C1eegC Jame Grabek, <br />The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this <br />26th day of June, 1989, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, <br />Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a N.innesota municipal <br />corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the <br />City. n i, r . <br />t a'R(cJ1 l� '� , <br />i,otar}• PubcI: ;; LA5 IE K. SCHEMER <br />T- . .�. •Lr Mit t� fU1lK � rttN++1301• <br />•.: 4 NNWN COUNTY <br />0AV eerrr.+i:e;on eeairetE•8.93 <br />My Commiss <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />