Laserfiche WebLink
City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTI0N OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2649 <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of <br />the City of Orono, hereby denies the application for placement of <br />fill and construction of retaining walls in the 0-75' iakeshore <br />setback zone based upon one or more of the following <br />findings of fact concerning this property: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1391. <br />2. The property is located in the LR -1C Lakeshore <br />Residential Zoning District and contains approximately 0.30 <br />acres in area. The LR -1C District requires 0.50 acres in <br />area. <br />3. Applicant constructed a single family residence on the <br />property in 1984, at which time grades around the residence <br />were established. The applicant maintains that the grades <br />established at the time the residence was constructed do not <br />allow for ease of maintenance of the lawn in the area <br />proposed for fill, and that placement of fill and <br />construction of retaining walls as proposed will alleviate <br />this problem. Applicant also maintains that the fill and <br />retaining walls in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone are <br />necessary to prevent drainage from flooding the neighboring <br />property. <br />4. The applicant proposes a retaining wall along the side <br />lot line to a point as close as 40' from the shoreline, with <br />placement of fill as near as 30' to the shoreline. <br />5. The City Engineer reviewed the proposal and recommended <br />that the retaining wall be constructed no closer than 70' <br />from the shoreline, and that fill placement be limited to <br />only that necessary to fill behind the wall and such fill <br />being placed no closer than 45' to the shoreline. <br />6. On May 15, 1989, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed <br />the proposal and recommended approval subject to the <br />conditions recommended by the City Engineer as noted above, <br />finding that the retaining wall as originally proposed by <br />the applicant is not strictly necessary to accomplish the <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />