Laserfiche WebLink
11INUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD 1ARCH 20, 1972 <br />Ryerse moved, Southworth seconded, that <br />since the lot has been in single separate <br />ownership prior to 196and is serviced <br />by sewer, that approval be recommended. <br />Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />Hr. Bertognoli represented himself in a lot <br />size and frontage variance of Lots 2-3, <br />Block 15, Saga Hill, 1415 Park Drive. <br />Members studied the map for density in the <br />area. There were three houses consisting <br />of one lot each in Block 15, one house <br />with two lots, Lots 2 & 3 are the subject <br />lots and Lots 6 & 7 are also vacant. It <br />was disctovered t;iat approval was given <br />by the Village Council in 1965 to build <br />on Lots 6 $ 7 if they were combined and <br />also Lots 2 & 3, if combined. To date, <br />this combination has not been made. The <br />area is serviced by sewer and would have <br />130' frontage and 31,000 sq. ft. of the <br />necessary 140' and 43,560 sq. ft. <br />I:ullberg moved, Ryerse seconded, that <br />they recommend that the original Village <br />Council decision of 1965 stand. Motion, <br />Ayes (7) - Nays (0). <br />Members unanimously agreed to table the <br />William Near matter of service station <br />construction on Wayzata Boulevard until <br />such time a conditional use permit is <br />applied for. <br />Herfurth reported that ;ie had attended tie <br />National Home Builders Convention in San <br />Francisco and had a great opportunity to <br />converse with knowledgeable people on PUD <br />ordinances and also to view some sites in <br />Kansas City and Salt Lake City. Since there <br />were so many variables in PUD ordinances, he <br />was of the opinion that the committee rough <br />up a PUD ordinance and let the Planning <br />Commission give opinions as to the desirability. <br />Ile posed a number of questions: <br />1. Does the Village wish to allow any increase <br />in density for amenities such an ordinance <br />would give? <br />2. Would PUD projects have to be zoned in by <br />areas or obtained by special use permits in <br />any sewâ–ºered area of the Village? <br />3. To what extent would the PUD ordinance allow <br />the developer to intermingle commercial, <br />industrial and residential usage? <br />Pa ge 2 <br />VARIANCE <br />1396 Baldur Park Road <br />(Continued) <br />VARIANCE <br />Lot Size and Frontage <br />1415 Park Drive <br />BUILDING PERAIT <br />William Wear <br />2120 Wayzata Boulevard <br />PUD ORDINANCE <br />