Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR AUGUST 9,1999 <br />(#9) #2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Willow Drive/Sixth Avenue North, Continued <br />Campion stated that the consensus of the Bancor Group is that they will not be able to proceed <br />forward with this development if it is reduced by more than four lots. Campion stated that they are <br />looking at approximately .85 dry tuildable acres per lot at this time, noting that the exact amount <br />of wetlands has not been defined. <br />Mayor Jabbour commented in his view his opinion regarding this parcel has changed sornewhat <br />over the years due to changes in the community as well as the new proposed Highway 12 comdcr. <br />Jabbour stated that according to City Code prior developers were given credit for wetlands when <br />City sewer was available. Jabbour commented in his opinion this property should be used as a <br />buffer zone. <br />Campion inquired whether the City Council would be requiring one acre lots for this development. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated this parcel should be developed as a PRD. with an average of one acre per <br />lot <br />Kelley commented that he personally is not in favor of rezoning this <br />the two acre zoning maintained. Kelley stated he would be in favor of a PRD with t.vo acre zoning. <br />Peterson commented that she also is in agreement with the two acre zoning. <br />Kelley stated that in his view the value of the property should be reduced In order to make this <br />development more economically feasible. <br />Campion stated they will need to address these issues further. <br />Gaffron commented that Sugarwccds was rezoned to one acre density. <br />Mayor Jabbour commented in his opinion the City should provide some higher ^snsi^ <br />within the City and that the Ciby Council should consider the possibility of rezonmg this property. <br />Kelley stated he would be in favcr of clustering units on this property, which <br />nisd to run sewer to a large nurr.ber of residences. Kelley commented he would l..<e to maintain <br />the tv/o acre zoning for this area and is nor in favor of higher density housing in is <br />Flint commented that he is troubled by the efforts to keep this area zoned at <br />this is not a prime piece of real estate and that the school and County Road 6 do impact this <br />property. <br />Sansevere stated he is in agree.r.ent with Flint and that in his opinion this property could be <br />rezoned one acre dry buildable. <br />Campion stated that one acre dr/ tuildable would not allow thei.- proposed development to work, <br />noting that the v/etlands and the streets need to be taken into account <br />Mayor Jabbour commented that he would be hard-pressed to vote in favor of appH^^on when <br />he has denied another similar proposal for this property. Jabbour stated he would b- mor <br />favorable towards a develcpme.nt proposing a maximum of 44 units. <br />Sansevere commented that the developer is proposing upper middle class housing for this area. <br />Page io~