My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-15-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
11-15-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2023 12:20:40 PM
Creation date
4/5/2023 12:14:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 18,1999 <br />(#2525 Larry Jacobson, Continued) <br />Lindquist inquired how far the detached garage would be from the residence. <br />Jacobson stated that the garage would be located eight feet from the residence. <br />Smith inquired whether the garage could be cownsized somewhat to reduce the need for a <br />variance. <br />Stoddard advised the Applicant to check with City Staff to determine whether a fire wall is needed <br />due to the closeness of the garage to the residence. Stoddard stated he would like to see the <br />garage conform to the side lot setback if possible. <br />Hawn stated in order for an variance to be granted, a hardship has to be demonstrated, which <br />has not been shown in her opinion. Hawn corr mented personally she would not be opposed to <br />attaching the garage to eliminate the need for a variance to the side yard setback. <br />Kluth commented that normally a hardship is d je to the topography of the land. <br />Jacobson stated they would prefer an attached garage but it would require a greater variance. <br />Jacobson submitted a drawing depicting an attached garage. <br />Lindquist commented he would be in agreement with an attached garage, but that an updated <br />survey is needed. <br />Hawn stated that the Planning Commission has to vote on the plan that is before them tonight, <br />but that an option would be for this application to be tabled in order to allow the Applicant time to <br />submit a revised plan showing an attached garage. <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that an attached garage would be preferred. <br />Hawn commented that a plan for an attached garage would still need to be submitted and reviewed <br />by the Planning Commission before it can be approved. <br />Lindquist inquired whether the Applicant would like; his application tabled tonight. <br />Jacobson indicated that would be fine. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Motion by Lindquist, second by Kluth, to table Application #2525, 635 Ferndale Road <br />North, to allow the Applicant time to submit a revised plan for an attached garage. <br />VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. <br />(#2) #252T1Wai5JEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT_:.£AIWTER*S CREEK BETWEEN <br />SOUTH KATRI n XWAR5I+AND COUNTY ROAD>-OOI«6mbNAL USE PERMIT, 6:45 p.m. <br />7:02 p.m. <br />The Certificate of Mailini Ftidavit of Publication lied. <br />Rodne'iTWenck Associates, Consulting Engineer, and Eric Evenson7t3<i lireQtor, <br />Page 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.