My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2023 11:15:11 AM
Creation date
4/5/2023 11:08:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />meeting HELD ON FEBRUARY 17,1998 <br />(#5 - #2339 James Render - Continued) <br />that the road is extended. Lindquist noted the need to determme whether a T or cul-de- <br />sac should be built. <br />Render informed McMUlan that he would ask for an additional 17’ to credit hardcover m <br />return for providing the dedicated roadway. Gaflfron informed McMillan that the typical <br />setbacks would be required. <br />recommendation for a 28' wide roadway. <br />appUcant ?f one was buUt. Smith suggested a shared dnveway be aUowed for two lots. <br />She recommended two driveways instead of the cul-de-sac. <br />Render clarified that the 28’ wide private road would extend only to where the turnaround <br />Ua l/^ratdsH rommissioners aereed. <br />sac <br />app <br />would be located. Commissioners agreed. <br />Berg aweed with Smith in prefemng no cul-de-sac. Gaf&on asked if the stwed toveway <br />would be between lots 2 and 3. Render said the shared dnveway would be located <br />between lots I and 2 for future access. <br />Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, to approve Apphcation #2 j39 wth the <br />undentanding that the 50 ’ right-of-way would extend the romplete lengt h he property <br />through the granting of 42' from the property owner ra addition to the c^ent 8 of <br />easement. The road would be a 28'shared private road vnth a paved T tui^oimd. The <br />applicant would be allowed a credit of a IT strip of land for hardcover allotment. <br />ftrnnhera asked if the road could be platted as a 25’ outlot with an additional 17 <br />eiet m. Undquist said it would have to be 50' platted through 42' from property owner <br />and 8' from other properties. <br />Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PRELIM <br />P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Pupation were noted. <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.