My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2023 11:15:11 AM
Creation date
4/5/2023 11:08:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES^F THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 23,1998 <br />(#12 - #2339 James Render - Continued) <br />Jabbour asked Barrett’s opinion regarding Staffs recommendation on the house <br />encroachment. Barrett agreed the recommendation was satisfactory as long as the special <br />lot combination was completed as a condition of the preliminary subdivision. <br />Render asked if the special lot combination requires further Council review. He was ' <br />informed that it can disappear after one year. Render asked if it was necessary for the <br />subdivision. Gafifton said it was not. <br />Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4053 for preliminary plat <br />approval with the addition that the easement will stop 5' fi'om the property line and a <br />special lot combination agreement is signed as drafted by the City with the house <br />remaining for a time period not to e.xceed 12 months. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(A short recess was held.) <br />(#13) #2341 DANIEL J. ANDERSON, 905 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL <br />The applicant was present along with Ed Otto, Kevin Prohasso and Marty Campion. <br />Gaffron reviewed the general direction previously given to the applicant by the Coimcil. <br />The stormwater plan has been submitted. City Engineer, Tom Kellogg, has reviewed it <br />and had some questions relating to the grading plan. A stormwater pond is proposed at <br />east end of Lot 7. It has been conflimed that Lot 7 meets the two acre minimun after <br />adjusting for the pond. <br />Cook was asked to comment. Cook said the amount of runoff that will reach the pond <br />will be an improvement over the current situation. Lots 4, 5, and 6 will drain runoff <br />toward the lake. Jabbour noted that by preserving the shoreline vegetation, there should <br />be no problem. Gaffron indicated that an option would be to create a second pond by the <br />lake but that would result in much damage to the shoreline. Cook agreed. <br />Marty said about 1/3 of the site will drain to the pond. The remainder will drain to the <br />north through a ditch system along the county road or to the lake directly. There will <br />also be less runoff on the north lot with the expected decrease of hard surface fi'om the <br />existing situation. Anderson said the goal for runoff from Lot 3 is to bring it to the fi*ont <br />by the cul-de-sac. <br />Gaf&on noted that the layout for Lot 7 technically makes the front lot line 50’ in length as <br />opposed to the 200 ’ standard. He questioned whether it should be considered a back lot. <br />Lot 7 will now accommodate stormwater while still having septic sites and building pad. <br />He asked if Council was satisfied with the layout of Lot 7 noting it appears to be <br />functional.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.