Laserfiche WebLink
minutes of the orono planning commission <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 20, 1997 <br />(#13 - #2305 Roger and Elizabeth Olsen - Continued) <br />Schroeder indicated he would have to review the plan. Berg said she would like to sec • <br />what the impacts are. Schroeder suggested guidance be given to the applicant. Lindquist <br />asked that the hardcover calculations be improved. Berg noted that the Planning <br />Commission must review the application that will be seen by the Council. <br />Olsen said the shift would change the front setback from 35’ to 32’ and asked if that was a <br />big consideration. He was informed that Lindquist that it was a consideration. <br />Schroeder questioned the need for 4 garage stalls. <br />Lindquist informed the applicant that the City does not like to see any structure within the <br />75' lakeshore setback. <br />Mrs. Olsen suggested the plain eliminate the 10' within the setback that is in question by <br />the covenants. Olsen said he could eliminate 10 ’ from the plan but would lose storage <br />space. Lindquist suggested the architectural design be considered as well. <br />Schroeder moved, Berg seconded, to table Application #2305. <br />Dr. Bill Cottleman, a next-door neighbor, was present representing the homeowners' <br />association. He submitted a letter form the architectural committee regarding their <br />restrictive covenants. He noted their restrictions are more stringent than those of the City. <br />He said the homeowners' association would approve the home bein't more centered on the <br />lot. A copy of the letter was submitted to staff. He said the associ ,*ion prefers to see as <br />much distance between the homes as possible. <br />a <br />Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#14T»23Q^LLEN PETERSON, HAVING AN MTEREST IN 3355 CRYSTAL <br />BAY ROAD>V4RI^CES - PUBLIC HEA^IKG 11:05-11:10 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publicalioh'aQd Certifi^it^f Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Photos were shown of the pr^erty. <br />Bressler reported th^tdne applicant is proposing Construction'bf^82 s.f. carport with a <br />deck above it attached to the front of the existing residence. TheY2M^ide carport would <br />extend 22’ out^er the existing driveway with a walkway. This propossd'^^ill require <br />variances fofside setback, lakeshore setback, and 0-75’ and 75-250’ setback^i^dcover.