My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2023 11:15:11 AM
Creation date
4/5/2023 11:08:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ANALYSIS <br />The approvals granted in 1986 assumed the current location for Highway 12. Highway 12 will be <br />relocated to the south parallel with the railroad tracks reducing existing Highway 12 from a major <br />highway route to a local arterial. There has been some interest in scaling back future development <br />of signage to accommodate a local arterial street rather than a State Highway. The concept of <br />monument style signs can be seen along the highway at Super America and McDonald's in Long <br />Lake. <br />The proposed sign is designed to be 17' in height, in contrast to the 26’ it was approved to be under <br />the previous development plan. The height can be compared to the Super America sign which is 13' <br />10" in height. <br />It can be argued the previous proposal would allow the existing pylon to the west to remain as well <br />as any building signage as permitted by Resolution No. 2073. The only change to the plan would <br />be the replacement of a sign which does require a variance for location and allowable sign space. <br />The most appropriate way to resolve the issue would be to approve variances for a signage plan to <br />allow the building allotment of signage and the west pylon to remain under the previous resolution, <br />with reduced signage for the Conoco station. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends denial of variances based on the signage proposed would not be allowed under <br />the existing Ordinance and the proposed pylon style sign would be in contrast to the character of the <br />locality. Staff recommends to the property owner to design a sign and base that conforms to a <br />smaller scale arterial street and utilizes materials used for the base of other monument signs in the <br />locality. <br />The use of the property is more in conformance with that listed in the "B-3" Shopping Center <br />District. If the property is zoned B-3 the lot would be allowed 380 s.f. of sign space. A variance <br />could be justified based on the use of the property is similar to that of a property in the B-3 District. <br />The Planning Commission noted in 1986 the applicable B-1 zoning standards are not compatible <br />with existing shopping center use and since 1980 B-3 shopping standards were found more <br />appropriate when considering signage needs of the property. <br />The Conoco station, as well as many other tenants, use an exterior entrance rather than a typical <br />interior entrance associated with other malls. It may be appropriate to approve additional signage <br />based on this need. <br />H2530 IViiiiam Hear <br />2160 Wayzata Blvd <br />10/18/99 <br />Page 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.