My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2023 11:15:11 AM
Creation date
4/5/2023 11:08:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 16.1998 <br />(M39S Brent Bentrott, continued) <br />the curb cut to Bluff Street to provide a less steep landing area. <br />Van Zomeren remarked that Tom Kellogg, City Engineer, has reviewed this property and has <br />concerns regarding the negative impact the grading would have on the adjoining property as well <br />as the need to relocate the curb cut on Bluff Street if that street is ever opened for public purpose. <br />Van Zomeren stated the Planning Commission had recommended in July that Bluff Street not be <br />vacated. The proposed driveway cannot be contained on the Applicant's property because of the <br />existing topography and the need to provide a grade of ten percent or less for the driveway. <br />Chair Smith stated to her recollection the reason the last plan submitted in October was not looked <br />favorably upon was due to concerns regarding grading and drainage, and this newly revised plan <br />seems to be similar to a previous plan that was submitted where the Applicant was advised that <br />the Planning Commission would not look favorably upon a vacation to Bluff Street. <br />Bentrott remarked this is a new plan that has not been submitted before. <br />Chair Smith commented this plan appears to have a different degree of impact on Bluff, but it was the <br />consensus of the Planning Commission a couple of months ago that they would not look favorably <br />upon any plan that would impact Bluff Street. <br />Van Zomeren stated that it was her understanding that Bluff Street currently contains a grade of <br />23 percent. <br />Bentrott stated he received Kellogg's letter on Thursday, noting that the proposed curb cut is <br />19 feet and not the 20 feet as stated in Kellogg's letter. Bentrott remarked the curb cut could be <br />further reduced if necessary. <br />Stoddard inquired whether the driveway could be completely located on the Applicant's property. <br />Van Zomeren stated the driveway cannot be located entirely on the Applicant's property due to the <br />topography that exists and the need to have a flat area to make the proper grade. Van Zomeren <br />commented that the grade of the driveway was not known at the last meeting. <br />Chair Smith inquired whether there were any public comments. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Chair Smith slated there has been some comments received from the adjoining neighbors Mark and <br />Pam Palm. <br />Van Zomeren remarked that City Staff has received some inquiries from the Palms regarding what <br />is being proposed. The Palms are proposing to do some underpinning around the foundation of their <br />house. The City Engineer has stated that grading cannot accurately occur up to the property line, <br />and that some grading may occur on the neighbor's property. <br />Chair Smith stated according to some comments contained in Van Zomeren's memorandum, the <br />Palms have concerns about the drainage impact on their property. Smith inquired what the Palms <br />exact concerns were regarding. <br />Van Zomeren stated the Palms have reviewed the proposed plan and called City Staff saying they <br />Page 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.