Laserfiche WebLink
V. CONCLUSION <br />The task force members hope that the information provided in this report and study <br />provides the Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, and Shakopee City Councils with sufficient <br />information to consider and evaluate the subject and potential impacts of SOBs, <br />including ^e experiences of other similarly situated communities. With this report as <br />background, each city council must now decide the following: <br />1. Should SOB regulations be adopted for the city? <br />2. What secondary effects are the regulations intended to minimize or <br />avoid? <br />3. <br />4. <br />Which of the recommended regulations should be adopted? <br />If location requirements are desired, which zoning districts should permit <br />SOBs and what are the appropriate separation distances that will still <br />provide SOBs a reasonable opportunity area to exist? <br />5.If operational standards are appropriate, should these be imposed <br />through a licensing requirement, as performance standards in the zoning <br />ordinance, or through the public nuisance ordinance? <br />6.if a licensing requirement is adopted, what will be the amount of the <br />license fee? <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br />Minnetonka:Virginia Finlayson, Planning Technician <br />Desyl Peterson, City Attorney <br />St. Louis Park:Judie Erickson, Planning Coordinator <br />Scott Moore, Zoning Administrator <br />Suesan Lea Pace, City Attorney* <br />Shakopee:Paul Bilotta, Community Development Director <br />Karen Marty, City Attorney <br />• Also Prior Lake City Attorney