Laserfiche WebLink
I. INTRODUCTION <br />had varying reasons for its interest in the subject. <br />s,. L.«i. p.*».pPP.-.PP. <br />came into question as the result o» 9 • . challenging <br />ordinance was adopted VeleTasesTealfwIJi ^dnances similar to the <br />SOB'S. <br />s, rsr.V ?pS.. »p ....... <br />regulations. <br />,n the fall of 1994. St. Louis Park <br />adopted interim ordinances gt Louis Park and Minnetonka City <br />on SOBS -hile a study was ^ Hopk^s <br />Managers met with the ^ j ^Iv and has not participated in this study. <br />sssSpS??.. r s,I-™* ~ <br />Study.OLUU y • <br />The joint study consisted of three components which are summarized in this report: <br />. . _________whichan examination of the broad legal parameters within whichan examincjuuM wi <br />regulations may be adopted. <br />a review of studies in other cities which <br />sexually oriented business on surrounding neighborhoods, and <br />preparation of proposed regulations, based on the experiences and <br />Studies of other similarly situated cities. <br />1