Laserfiche WebLink
nias Baltimore Bqulwsrrt . sues. 684 F. Supp., at 895; see also Tollie « s.„ <br />Bernad,^ County. 827 F.2d 1329. i333 (9th C^. 1987) (ordinan^colS^^J^;^ <br />single Sluing o1 adult movie in zoned area; invalidated tor failure to present e^S^M <br />of secondary effects of single showing); butsee Thames Enterprises <br />SS).’”’ bTiegisiL Of secSidary effeS <br />^ * is not necessary tor each municipality to conduct research <br />other cHies. The Renton court held that <br />^ence of the need tor zoning of sexually oriented businesses can be provided by <br />studies from other cities “so long as whatever evidence the dty rette uoon^ <br />«eso« *“ that the dty addressee.: a.^51? <br />Ss^De^^ opponents and tinsideitloh'or <br />shj^tV Detroit. Boston. Dallas and Los Angeles suffident evidence of legitimate <br />f summarizes evidence from various dues'- <br />Following asntsa,-^is bitted that local communities will make use of this evidence in the course Of <br />assembling support for reasonable regulation of sexually oriented businesses. <br />P <br />of Locations ter SAviiaii <br />£• <br />oretfl^nf^hr'T® businesses is merely a <br />oriented business. Renton, supra 475 U.S. at 54. toe S. ct «mm? <br />unra^^^h!"^ !w *^*®*^*^** unduly restricted if adult entertairvnent zones are <br />no sat am ^ f""* i ^ '*’* number of locations is unreasonably few. There is <br />no set amount of land or number of locations constitutionally required. The Renton <br />-37-