My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
10-18-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2023 11:15:11 AM
Creation date
4/5/2023 11:08:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />Many communities in Minnesota have raised concerns about the impact of <br />sexually oriented businesses on their quality of life. It has been suggested that sexually <br />oriented businesses serve as a magnet to draw prostitution and other crimes Into a <br />vulnerable neighborhood. Community groups have also voiced the concern that <br />sexually oriented businesses can have an adverse effect on property values and <br />impede neighborhood revitalization. It has been suggested that spillover effects of the <br />businesses can lead to sexual harassment of residents and scatter unwanted evidence <br />of sexual liaisons in the paths of children and the yards of neighbors. <br />Although many communities have sought to regulate sexually oriented businesses, <br />these efforts have often been controversial and equally often unsuccessful. Much <br />community sentiment against sexually oriented businesses is an outgrowth of ho^ity <br />to sexually explicit forms of expression. Any successful strategy to combat sexually <br />oriented businesses must take Into account the constitutional rights to free speech <br />which limit available remedies. <br />Only those pornographic materials which are detennined to be “obscene” have no <br />constitutional protection. As explained later in more detaii, only that pornography <br />which, according to community standards and taken as a whole, “appeals to the <br />prurient interest” (as opposed to an interest in healthy sexuality), describes or depicts <br />sexual conduct In a “patently offensive way” and “lacks serious literary, artistic, political <br />or scientific value.” can be prohibited or prosecuted. Miller v. California. 413 U.S. 15, <br />24 (1973). <br />• <br />Other pornography and the businesses which purvey it can only be regulated <br />where a harm is demonstrated and the remedy is sufficiently tailored to prevent that <br />harm without burdening Rrst Amendment rights. In order to reduce or eliminate the <br />impacts of sexually oriented businesses, each community must find the balance <br />between the dangers of pornography and the constitutional rights to free speech. Each <br />community must have evidence of harm. Each community must know the range of; <br />legal tools which can be used to combat the adverse impacts of pornography and <br />sexually oriented businesses. <br />•1.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.