My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-01-14 Memo, Maintenance of Ditch
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Briar Street
>
1295 Briar Street - PID: 10-117-23-31-0044
>
Correspondence
>
1985-01-14 Memo, Maintenance of Ditch
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:23:37 PM
Creation date
4/3/2023 10:33:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1295
Street Name
Briar
Street Type
Street
Address
1295 Briar Street
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
1011723310044
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANALYSIS <br />This situation presents essentially two questions: <br />(1) Whether the City is responsible for the <br />maintenance of the ditch; and <br />(2) Whether the City is responsible or liable for <br />the ponding of water on the Jentolucci property. <br />Maintenance of Ditch. The City is not responsible <br />for the maintenance of private drainage systems within the City <br />limits. Oro::o Municipal Code, §9.04, subd. 1(b) defines a <br />"private drainage system" as any "storm sewer, ditch, tile <br />line, or other facility, together with all appurtenances <br />thereto, (1) constructed by a private person, or (2) existing <br />on private property, for the purposes of collecting or <br />conveying natural precipitation." Subd. 2 of that section <br />further provides that "it is the responsibility of the owner of <br />any private drainage system, or the owner of the land upon <br />which it is constructed, to maintain such system in good and <br />workable condition ' <br />Hence, pursuant to City ordinance, the Jentoluccis, <br />not the City, are responsible for the maintenance of the <br />drainage ditcn. <br />'Responsibility for Water Runoff. The general rule in <br />Minnesota regarding the diversion of surface water is that if a <br />municipality in its work of improving its streets or public <br />places interferes with the natural flowage of surface water or <br />fails to take care of it, it is riot liable if the pos essor of <br />the lower land is no worse off than before. Roche v. City of <br />Minneapolis, 27 N.W.2d 195, 297-98 (1947). Thus, only if the <br />presence oT the culvert increases the runoff onto the <br />Jentolucci land would the City be responsible. John Gerhardson <br />has stated that in his opinion the same amount of water would <br />run onto the Jentolucci property, regardless of the presence of <br />the culvert. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Based upon the available information, it does not <br />appear that the City is responsible for either the maintenance <br />of the ditch or the presence of the ponding water. As part of <br />the Crystal Bay Sewer Improvement Project, the City may wish to <br />have the City Engineer address alternatives to alleviate the <br />runoff. <br />0431F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.