My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-16-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
08-16-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 4:21:45 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 4:20:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 <br />(#2501 City of Orono, Continued) <br />should be maintained and improved, noting that the present dock is not very stable. Mueller <br />commented that she had questioned whether a bench could be located near the dock, and inquired <br />v hetherthat would be permitted. Mueller stated as far as drainage is concerned, there is a <br />catch basin and culvert in the area, which should be able to handle the runoff from the street. <br />Jeff Mueller, 222 Bederwood Drive, commented he would like to see the dock improved, noting that <br />he is not in favor of wetlands being filled, but that this dock should be accessible. <br />Sherokee Use, Parks Commission, stated this application has appeared before the Parks <br />Commission twice, with the general consensus of the commission that the filling of the wetland <br />should be avoided if at all possible. Use commented that the Parks Commission would like to see <br />the dock extended. <br />Use also inquired if the fill was to be located in the area where the cattails have been cut down <br />Gappa stated he was unfamiliar with what area had been cut down <br />Use stated that she personally is concerned that the City of Orono is setting a bad precedent by <br />allowing the wetland to be filled, and urged the Planning Commission to consider other options. <br />Use stated that the catch basin in this area appears to be clogged, and that in her opinion any <br />fill placed in the wetland will wash away due to the runoff from the street. Use stressed the <br />importance of the wetlands and how they should be preserved. <br />Hawn inquired whether extension of the dock has hr- r^'ns d by City Staff. <br />Gappa stated that extension of the dock would be ;ue to the uneven topography in the <br />area. Gappa stated it is the City's intention to direct the water runoff around the walkway and to <br />have the area reseeded. <br />Stoddard inquired whether filling of the wetlands would impact the number of snowmobilers who <br />currently access the lake from this area. Stoddard noted that handicap accessibility is one reason <br />for the nil. <br />Gappa stated it is his understanding that snowmobiles are not allowed east of Stubbs Bay and that <br />this is a connection to the Luce Line, which has existed for many years. <br />Jeff Mueller commented that the Snowmobile Association paid a significant amount of money for <br />that access and that this fill should not increase the number of snowmobilers who utilize this access <br />Gappa stated that the City will make this dock handicap accessible, noting that it is not the City's <br />intention to allow boat launching in this area. <br />Smith inquired how the City's survey could be inaccurate <br />Gappa stated that there was a change in ownership of the adjoining property, with the previous <br />owner never raising an issue with the location of the dock. Gappa noted that the City has verified the <br />property lines. <br />Kluth comme'^'ied that the City may legally be entitled to keep the dock in its old location due to the <br />fact that it existed in that location for a number of years. <br />Page 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.