My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-19-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
07-19-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 4:01:10 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 3:57:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
•• i <br />ip <br />TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />FROM:Kris Jenson, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner <br />DATE: . July?, 1999 <br />SUBJECT: #2504 - Warren & Tana Garrett, 650 Brown Road North <br />Variance Request <br />Zoning District: LR -1A <br />Application:The applicant proposes to install a 3 rail, split-rail fence, 5' in height, along <br />the south property line to the lakeshore as well as a home addition, a deck <br />addition and an inground swimming pool with decking around the pool, all <br />located between the house and the lake. <br />t .r <br />STAFF SUMMARY <br />First, the applicants are planning an addition to the Northeast comer of the home. The <br />addition is 12' x 20’ and will line up with the existing North wall of the home and the existing East <br />side of the deck. <br />Second, the applicants are proposing a deck addition and inground swunming pool. The total <br />surface area of the additions, along with the existing hardcover in the 250'-500' will not exceed 30%. <br />The proposed deck addition will be added to the southeast comer of the existing deck, with the <br />inground pool located approximately 30' east of the existing deck. The variance required for these <br />items is the average lakeshore setback. Since the applicant ’s home is located closer to the lake than <br />either of its neighbors, the average lakeshore setback is their existing home, or approximately 385'. <br />Along the north and south property lines are mature stands of trees that buffer the vie\v to either <br />property owners to the north and south. Staff feels that the proposed location is the most logical, <br />and it will not block or interfere with the view of either nei^bor towards the lake. <br />Finally, the applicants are proposing a 3-rail, split rail fence, no more than 5' in height, to run <br />along the south property line, from the driveway to the lakeshore, approximately 790’ in length. The <br />applicants want a fence due to the fact that the neighboring lakeshore owner to the south is a Long <br />Lake City Park, and the applicant's have had people trespass on their property and dock. The <br />applicant's feel that the proposed fence will be high enough to deter trespassers, but will not block <br />the view of the townhome owners. The President of the West Shore Townhome Association ha" <br />written a letter to the City protesting any fence being erected on the applicant ’s property. A copy <br />of the letter is included in the exhibits. <br />12504 Warrtn &. Tana Garrett <br />650 Broken Road North <br />July 7.1999 <br />Page I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.