My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
05-17-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 3:22:56 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 3:18:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 19,1999 <br />(#24S1 Spring Hill Golf Club, continued) <br />Stoddard moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2480, Spring <br />Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North, for the rezoning of the portion outlined in the <br />April 14,1999 Planner's Report from RR-1B-1 to RR-1B, subject to the conditions contained <br />in the April 14,1999 Planner's Report. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />14. #2482 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH • CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT, 8:43 p.m. • 8:57 p.m. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Tim Johnson, spring Hill Golf Club Representative, was present. <br />Gaffron stated at the time of the conditional use permit for the Golf Club, plans showed an existing <br />Spring Hill caretaker house, which at the time was thought to be likely to be removed. The <br />conditional use permit did not contain the appropnate language to allow the caretaker house to <br />be retained. Condition three of Resolution No. 3902 requires an amendment to the cono.iional use <br />permit if additional accessory buildings are proposed. Because it will act as a "guest house", the <br />caretaker house also requires a Guest House Conditional Use Permit. <br />Gaffron stated the property does meet the required setbacks and lot size requirements to allow <br />the caretaker house to remain on the property. The Golf Club is proposing to utilize the caretaker <br />house as a residence for one or more employees of the Club, which would appear to be covered <br />under the definition of a "guest House" in Section 10.20 Subdivision 3(G) as an accessory separate <br />dwelling for the sole use of the occupants of the primary dwelling. Including their domestic <br />employees or their non-paying guests. <br />City Staff is recommending approval of this application. <br />Johnson stated this was an oversight on the part of the Golf Course and it has been their intent all <br />along to retain the caretaker house. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Smith commented that to her understanding the caretaker house was to be removed after a pen'od <br />of time. <br />Johnson stated there was a farmhouse originally on the property which was removed. The Golf Club <br />does not intend the caretaker house to be used overnight by Its guests but will be occupied at this <br />time by a caretaker. <br />Gaffron stated that City Staff is recommending that the caretaker house not be rented out and shall <br />be occupied only by employees of the Club. <br />Stoddard commented that in his view the guest house only allows the structure to be occupied by <br />family members or ov/ners of the property. <br />Gaffron remarked that the code reads non-paying guests. The City has provided for caretaker units <br />at marina areas for security in the past, and City Staff is viewing this as the same situation. <br />Smith commented she does not want to see this caretaker house be utilized as a hotel for <br />Page 12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.