Laserfiche WebLink
Issues for Discussion <br />1.Lot A contains two oversized accessory structures requiring variances to permit two <br />oversized accessory buildings on one 12 acre lot where one is allowed, to permit two <br />oversized accessory buildings larger than the 3,000 s.f., and to permit 14,497 s.f. for all <br />accessory buildings where 6,000 s.f. is allowed. Is it the position of the Planning <br />Commission the pole shed and bam are compatible with the use on the property and warrant <br />variances on a 12 acre lot, where they currently exist on a 37 acre site? <br />2.A second residential unit exists on Lot A. The propertiw were combined in 1995, however <br />a guest house conditional use permit has not been applied for. <br />3.Two storage sheds are located on Lot B. They will require variances to remain on a lot <br />without a principal structure. <br />4.If future property owners wish to use the property for commercial purposes it appears the <br />Conditional Use Permit, adopted by Resolution No. 1894, would no longer be valid since the <br />property will be reduced in size. <br />Recommendation <br />The property should support additional residential lots in the future to the west it an access road is <br />added and suitable septic sites are located. The concern is the use of the oversized arena and bam <br />on a 12 acre farm rather than the existing 37 acres. <br />Exhibits <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />Application <br />Location <br />Proposed Lot Division <br />Air Photo <br />Site Topography <br />Resolution No. 1894 <br />City Wetland Map <br />§2491 Dtbonh M. Scholl <br />4100 l9lattrtomt Road <br />Saleh Plan Rgvkw <br />5/17/99 <br />Pago 6