My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
05-17-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 3:22:56 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 3:18:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2490 - VanEeckhout Sketch Plan <br />May 12,1999 <br />Page 3 <br />meet the 150% area requirement. Wetland appears to be a factor here which has led to the shortened <br />cul-de-sac and two back lots being proposed. <br />In general, there is a significant of disconnected dry buildable on this property which begs the use <br />of a PRD, regardless whether it is platted under the 2-acre or 1-acre standards. <br />Road Layout and Standards <br />There are a number of problems with the proposed private road system: <br />There is only a 40'corridor coming in off Browm Road where 50' would be required. <br />Outlot A should be extended to serve at least Lot 2, Block 1 rather than stacking back lots <br />on a narrow drivway outlot. <br />Outlot B would probably work OK if Lots 3 and 4 weren't developed, but may need <br />significant land alteration to result in the maximum 12% slope allowed. Outlot C in staffs <br />opinion should be avoided as an access to Lots 3 and 4. <br />Park/Trail Easements or Dedication Needed? <br />The Park Commission will review this proposal if it goes forward as a preliminary plat. Neither the <br />City's park plans nor County plans indicate a need for any acquisitions at this location. The apparent <br />proposal to deed Outlot E, the wetlands, as Park area is not likely to be accepted since the <br />subdivision code would require that a Drainage Easement or Flowage and Conservation Easement <br />be dedicated over the wetlands and creek as a condition of plat approval. The Park dedication <br />ordinance requires that lands dedicated as park be suited for defined park purposes. This area does <br />not appear to have such a purpose, and the City likely would require a park dedication fee ratlier than <br />land dedication. However, there is a possibility that the proximity to the Luce Line Trail would <br />suggest that some Iruid adjacent to the trail may be suited for park use... <br />Road Improvements and/or Easements Needed <br />A dedication of 33' of right of way for Brown Road would be required. Comments from Hennepin <br />County Public Works would be solicited if/when a preliminary plat application is made. <br />Stormwater and Drainage Improvements <br />The sketch plan drawings do not propose any stormwater facilities w'hich wou.d likely be required. <br />The property appears to accept drainage from the adjacent developments in Long Lake, and due the <br />pro?dmity to the creek, stonnwater management, especially from a quality standpoint, will have to <br />be developed if this subdivision goes forward.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.