Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 20,1998 <br />• <br />(Gary O’Keefej continued) <br />. hardcover than what is being recommended by the Planning Commission. Hardcover back in 1990 <br />without the two zones being combined was at approximately 6,800 square feel. <br />• • • • * <br />• • • • • • <br />Chair Smith questioned whether Staff had any concerns regarding the drainage for this property. <br />Gaffron remarked Staff is comfortable with what Is being proposed. <br />Mike Sharratt, Architect, staled the O’Keefe’s have reduced hardcover by eliminating the patio and <br />a portion of the driveway, but would like the Planning Commission to consider allowing a retention <br />pond as mitigation in exchange for additional hardcover. <br />Chair Smith commented the architect has done a marvelous job In bringing the plans into compliance, <br />but stated the size of the house could be reduced to allow for the patio. <br />Chair SmUh asked for public comment. <br />• Mark Versig, neighbor, commented he is aware and in favor of what the O’Keefe’s are proposing to do, <br />noting that the drainage problems should be alleviated by the proposed grading. <br />.» ' <br />Sharratt stated what is currently being proposed Is the best plan for this property. <br />Gaffron stated he is in favor of the retention pond but Is not convinced it should be used as mitigation <br />for additional hardcover. <br />McMillan stated she would not be in favor of additional hardcover in exchange for the retention pond <br />since it would be setting a dangerous precedent, but felt the retention pond would be an ideal <br />solution to the drainage issue. <br />Lindquist stated he was in favor of the proposed plan with the exclusion of the patio. <br />Stoddard noted the size of the house or the driveway could be reduced to allow for the patio. <br />Sharratt remarked It would not be feasible to reduce the driveway any further. Sharratt commented if <br />the hardcover is limited to 25%, he would not recommend reducing the size of the house to allow for <br />the patio. <br />Chair Smith staled she is in favor of keeping the hardcover at 25 percent, noting the owner will need to <br />decide whether the patic is desired. <br />• * <br />Hawn stated she also was in favor of limiting the hardcover to 25%. <br />Gaffron commented if the O'Keefe’s decide to add a retention pond, that would need to be done under <br />a separate application. <br />Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to approve Application #2370, granting a conditional <br />use permit for grading within 5’ of a lot line and within the 0-75’ lakeshore protected area <br />to permit construction of a new residence to replace the existing residence for the property <br />located at 1392 Batdur Park Road, with the understanding hardcover will be limited to 25% <br />in the combined 75-250* and south 0-75’ zones with no additional hardcover being allowed. <br />Per the request of the O’Keefe’s, the patio will be eliminated. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />Page 3