My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
04-19-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 2:51:29 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 2:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 15.199» <br />(03 - ^2370 Gary O'Keefe - Continued) <br />City Staff is recommending submittal of a revised grading plan, limiting the hardcover to 6765 <br />quarc feet Overall, no walkou^ and ev^ating whether grading of the hill is appropriate in the 0-75'S <br />zones. <br />• • • • , • . . * <br />* • . . . • . . • <br />0*KMre.stoted he is willing to reduce hardcover by eliminating a portion of the driveway. ' <br />Chair Smith commented she had hoped the hardcover discrepancy could have been resolved prior' <br />to tonight's meeting. O'Keefe stated that he calculated the hardcover at 8,665 square feet based on his <br />own measurements. Gaffron noted that the staff did not calculate the current hardcover but relied <br />upon an existing survey. Gaffron commented he would prefer having the O'Keefe's survev or calculate <br />the amount of hardcover currently existing rather than have City Staff review the property. Gaffron <br />indicated a bigger issue for the Planning Commission to decide upon is what is the appropriate <br />hardcover for this propert)'. <br />O'Keefe inquired why there are differences in hardcover requirements between Wav’zata and <br />Orono when tliey share the same lake. McMillan indicated Orono’s ordinances governing hardcover <br />are more restrictive. <br />O'Kwfe also indicated ver>' little grading vrill be done in the area where the residence is presently <br />situated. <br />It was the concensus of the Planning Commission that a revised grading plan needs to be submitted in <br />order to allow them to make a detemiination on a variance and conditional use penuit. <br />O'Keefe indicated he would be able to supply a revised grading plan by Tluirsday. <br />In response to a question by Chair Smith whether Mr. O'Keefe would be willing to reduce hardcover <br />in the 75-250' zones, O'Keefe stated he would be in favor of reducing hardcover, noting that the <br />Planning Commission had recommended hardcover be limited to 40% at its last meeting, which he <br />has attempted to comply with. O’Keefe's architect has designed the residence with special pavers <br />which would allow water to pass through. <br />Commissioners agreed that grading to blend in with the neighbor's property was acceptable with <br />an approved grading plan. <br />• <br />Chair Smith inquired whether anyone from the public wisTied to comment on this application. " <br />Diann Goetten, City Council Representative, inquired why 40% hardcover was being recommended <br />for this property. <br />, Gaffron reported that 40% in the 75-250' zone was suggested as a figure that could be obtainable for <br />this parcel of land. Since the Applicant is now proposing to raze the existing structure, the property <br />would be considered as a new* buildable lot, '■ ‘ . and <br />the standard hardcover requirements would be in effect. <br />There was no further public comment. <br />Hawn staled she would like hardcover to be reduced from 40%, noting that no vote was taken on
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.