Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1995 <br />(#2469 Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum, continued) <br />Weinberger stated the curb cut on Birch Lane is presentiy 44 square feet, which wiii be reduced to <br />meet the maximum of 20 feet aiiowed by the City. The propos^ iocation of the house is aiso <br />beyond the 75 feet required for structure from the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. <br />Weinberger stated due to the high water tabie on this property, a basement wiii not be supported, <br />which does pose a hardship. Weinberger noted the Appiicants have expiored other options of <br />adding on to the present structure but the present foundation does not support any addition. <br />Nusbaum stated the garage suffered storm damage last year and a new roof was put on the <br />structure. <br />Chair Smith noted that the Appiicants are proposing to make significant reductions in the hardcover, <br />but the Planning Commission likes to see new structure conform to the 15 percent structural <br />coverage limit whenever possible. <br />Nusbaum commented that this plan has been revised once already to reduce hardcover and his <br />architect has recommended this size of structure to keep the residence within the character of the <br />rest of the neighborhood. <br />Mrs. Nusbaum stated they would like a house to comfortably accommodate a family of four, <br />noting that the present structure was at one time an old cabin. Nusbaum commented they have <br />looked at various options for this property in an effon to reduce hardcover. <br />Chair Smith commented that the CHy is concerned about the possible impact the hardcover would <br />have on Lake Minnetonka and that structural coverage should be closer to the limit of 15 percent. <br />Hawn indicated she was in agreement with Smith. Hawn suggested that perhaps the garage could <br />be incorporated somehow with the house, but as the proposal is presently before the Planning <br />Commission, she would not be able to approve the application due to the high structural coverage. <br />Nusbaum requested the Planning Commission take into consideration the improvements they are <br />proposing to make to the existing hardcover. <br />Hawn commented that the Planning Commission needs to remain consistent on the 15 percent <br />limit, noting that many applications of this type appear before the Planning Commission. <br />Schroeder remarked that the City needs to protect Lake Minnetonka whenever possible. <br />Chair Smith inquired whether there were any public comments. <br />Jim Daly, 3458 North Shore Drive, commented that in his view this proposal is not excessive and <br />the Applicants should not be penalized for their smalt lot. <br />Mrs. Nusbaum commented that they would like to reach some type of agreement on the structural <br />coverage. <br />Lindquist stated whenever new strudure is being proposed, the Planning Commission likes to have <br />the Applicants hold to the 15 percent structural coverage limit. <br />McMillan suggested that since some major improvements to hardcover are being proposed, that <br />perhaps some flexibility could be given on the structural coverage. <br />Page 19