My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
04-19-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 2:51:29 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 2:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES FOR MARCH IS, 1999 <br />(#2458 Proposed Zoning Amendment, continued) <br />Nancy Mead, 30 Interlocken Lane, inquired whether this item could be tabled in order to allow her <br />brother. Paul Larson, to attend the meeting to express his concerns regarding the proposed <br />amendment. Mead indicated her brother will be out of town for the next few days. <br />Monica Brown. Brown Road South, stated she had a question regarding clustering. <br />Smith stated that is one option that could be utilized. <br />Gaffron stated that any property that took advantage of the PRO standards would have to <br />cluster. If the resident chose to do a straight subdivision, you could have 1/2 acre lots under the <br />proposed ordinance without having to cluster. Gaffron remarked that this proposed zoning <br />amendment only affects the LR-1C-1 district, which is less than 30 acres. <br />Hawn inquired if you have to do either a PRD or a subdivision so that you cannot take a two acre <br />lot and have a three unit building with a single home. <br />Gaffron stated if you take a two acre site, such as the Larson property, under the standard 1/2 acre <br />zoning, you could potentially construct four units, but under standard plat, you have to exclude the <br />area of the road, so it's likely that you would only have three units. Under a PRD, under the <br />proposed zoning, you can have two attached units, but you cannot have a single unit under this <br />zoning amendment. <br />Hawn stated she was in favor of option one, but had some concerns that Larson was not in <br />attendance at tonight's meeting to express his views. Hawn inquired whether compensation is <br />available to those property owners who would be affected by this ordinance. <br />Gaffron stated the City has not offered compensation to property owners affected by zoning <br />changes in the past. <br />Schroeder remarked that this zoning amendment is not directed at any single piece of property. <br />McMillan inquired whether he would be able to attend the March 22 City Council meeting. <br />Mead commented that she expected her brother back in two to three days and that he should be <br />able to attend Monday's meeting. <br />Gaffron stated if the Planning Commission takes action on this item tonight, it will be presented to <br />the City Council at the March 22 meeting. <br />Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, recommending that District LR*1C*1 be amended <br />to eliminate 50 percent density credit but allow attachment of units via PRD to remain, <br />adding Shoreland reference and revising hardcover standard. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />NEW BUSiNESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />(#5) #2444 BRIAN AND SUSAN SCHEBLER, 1354 REST POINT CIRCLE • VARIANCE, <br />7:33 p.m. - 8:02 p.m. <br />Brian and Susan Schebler, Applicants, were present. <br />Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting an after-the-fact variance to pen«:it a detached. <br />Page 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.