My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-15-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
03-15-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 2:52:27 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 2:44:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• • <br />Resolution #4143 Application <br />House <br />•v-v* <br />2,440 sq. ft. <br />.. ir <br />3,946 sq. ^.(includes 1,820 <br />sq.ft, for porch) <br />Garage 680 sq.ft.858 sq. ft. <br />Stoops, walks, patios 360 sq. ft.156 sq. ft. <br />Driveway 2,245 sq.ft.760 sq. tt.(not enough <br />parking area in front of <br />garage) <br />Total 5,725 sq. ft.5,720 sq. ft. <br />The application proposes less hardcover than the amount of hardcover that was approved in the <br />previous resolution. This application, however, requires more variances for side yard setback for <br />the garage, setback between the accessory and principal structures and a structural lot coverage <br />variance. Staff also does not believe that the driveway was drawn to adequately reflect what is <br />typically needed for a parking area in front of a 3 car garage. <br />Where the previous application required a hardcover variance to allow a longer driveway to match <br />the topography and to allow an attached garage, this application minimizes the non-structural <br />hardcover for a driveway by proposing a detached garage with a narrow parking pad. More <br />hardcover is put into structures*-for the larger garage and the porch. <br />The need for a hardcover variance in the 75'-250' setback is a design issue and is not due to any <br />uniqueness of the lot. Hardcover and structural coverage could be reduced through redesign. The <br />Planning Commission should also consider the location and size of the detached garage as the garage <br />doors will face the lake and the adjacent property to the west currently may enjoy a view of the lake <br />through this area. The average lakeshore setback does not apply to the street side of this lot even <br />though it is located on the lake. <br />STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP <br />The applicant has indicated that the hardship is having two 0'-75’ setbacks. Having lake views on <br />each side, however, is an amenity. <br />U2457 David and Paula Lindberg <br />1392 Baldur Park Road <br />PC-2/16/99 <br />page-5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.