My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-15-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
03-15-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 2:52:27 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 2:44:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONd PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 <br />(#8) #2448 KEITH WATERS ASSOC JDOUO CARLSON/C. RAY, 780 NORTH ARM DRIVE, <br />VARIANCES, 9:48 p.m. -10:00 p.m. <br />Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She stated that the applicants are proposing to^fdmodel an <br />existing residence. The proposed changes require two variances. One variance is for^erage <br />lakeshore setback because the e)dsting house Is located almost entirely In the fron^tback. The <br />average lakeshore setback for the residence has slightly changed recently due tomew construction <br />on the adjacent southern lot. Another variance is required for top of bluff setback bemuse the <br />residence is partially located within the required 30‘ top of bluff setback. 8]>dmated there are no <br />negative Impacts with this proposal and staff recommends approval. <br />Catherine Ray and Blake Bichanlch were present. <br />Ray stated that the neighbors support the application. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Schroeder asked how the hardcover would be redi <br />Bichanlch responded that most of it Is relatej <br />landscaping, such as pavers and railroad <br />(o the existing driveway and the rest is mostly <br />McMillan asked if the old garage wquia be retained. <br />Bichanlch stated that the old gar^e will be used as a workshop and not for vehicles. The old <br />driveway Is very steep and wmbe landscaped for gardens. <br />Ray stated that one of^ reasons for the addition of the new garage is that access to the existing <br />garage Is very diffigmfor a vehicle and they will not use the old garage for parking vehicles. <br />Stoddard state^e can approve the proposal. <br />McMillaa,#rated the addition fits In very well with the contour of the house. <br />Median moved, Stoddard seconded, a motion to approve Application #2448 for Doug <br />(rtson and Catherine Ray, 780 North Arm Drive for Top of Bluff and Average Lakeshore <br />tetback Variances. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#9) #2451 LYLE AND ORETCHEN SHAW, 1760 8HADYWOOD ROAD, VARIANCES, 10:00 p.m. - <br />10:15 p.m. <br />Weinberger presented the staff report. He stated that the applicants have proposed to co.nsL'uct a <br />786-square-foot addition which would include a two-stall garage and two levels of living space above <br />it attached to the existing residence. The existing residence is 20' x 36’. There is no existing garage. <br />This application requires variances to allow 51.1% haidcover where 25% is allowed in the 75’-250’ <br />lakeshore setback, and to allow 15.8% total structural coverage where 15% is allowed. He said that <br />all setback requirements are being met. Staff recommends denial of the application based on <br />hardcover of 51.1 % where only 15.3% exists and 25% is allowed, and structural coverage being <br />greater than 15%. He stated that should the Planning Commission approve the application, staff <br />recommends the applicant provide a drainage plan prior to the issuance of a building permit that <br />would be acceptable to City Staff to show the proposed development would not pose a risk to the <br />subject property or adjacent properties. <br />Lyle and Gretchen Shaw, the applicants, were present. Gerald Roelofs, their builder, was also <br />present. <br />Page 14 <br />;: <br />I. <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.