My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-15-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
03-15-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 2:52:27 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 2:44:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 <br />m 1*2467 DAVID AND PAULA UNDBERG, 13S2 BALDUR PARK ROAD, VARIANCES <br />Continued <br />Julie and Mark VerSteege, neighbors to the north, said they want to make sure the runoff stays on <br />the applicant’s property, and does not drain into their basement. <br />Mabusth asked if the applicants have submitted a grading plan. <br />Van Zomeren said the plan was submitted to Tom Kellogg, the City Engineer. He said to make sure <br />silt control fences are used. The City Engineer’s first reviev.* did not flag any major concerns. <br />Mabusth asked if the surveyor has confirmed that there is no iverage lakeshore setback problem. <br />Van Zomeren said yes. <br />Hawn asked if the applicants have looked at reducing the structural coverage by 40 square feet. <br />David Lindberg said they are willing to reduce the structural coverage. <br />McMillan questioned the detached garage. <br />Lindberg said an attached garage would require a larger driveway and addHional grading. <br />McMillan suggested repositioning the garage in order to reduce the slope and improve safety. <br />Mabusth questioned why the O’Keefe application was so much lower in hardcover in the 75 ’>250* <br />setback. <br />Lindberg said the O’Keefe’s had more driveway and a smaller garage. <br />Mabusth asked how the other commission members felt about the hardcover in the 75 ’-250 ’ setback. <br />Hawn said this is a difficult site. She would like to see the structural coverage reduced by 40 square <br />feet. <br />Mabusth asked staff to review the variances that would be needed with the current plan. <br />Van Zomeren said they would need a variance for the 0’-75 ’ setback on the south side, a variance in <br />the 75 ’-250 ’ setback to allow 33% where 25% is allowed, a conditional use permit for grading within <br />five feet of the property line and re^oration of the topography. <br />McMillan asked about the O’Keefe’s plan and what the amount of hardcover was in the 75'-250 ’. <br />Van Zomeren said it was 5,725 square feet. <br />Mabusth asked if the garage design would match the house. <br />Lindberg said the garage would match the house. <br />Mabusth said the Commission would have a problem approving 33% hardcover in the 75 ’-250 ’ <br />setback. She asked about the hardcover that would result from the porches. <br />Van Zomeren reviewed the square footage of the hardcover. She said they would need to reduce <br />1,000 square feet to meet the 25% requirement. <br />Paged
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.