02-16-1999 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 (ia) W2449 JOHN VOQT/WttKE HILBEUNK, HAVINQ AN INTEREST IN 3020 WATERTOWN ROAD - Continued Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, a motion to approve #2449 for Mike Hiibeiink and John Vogt, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road, Ciass III Preliminary Plat Subdivision, with the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. There will be an Oudot B that is 60* wide along the northern edge with a 100* cul-de< sac, with 80* of paved area. Accessory structure total lot coverage will be determined and the historical significance will be determined. A variance obtained for the location of the drainfield on Lot 3. Park Dedication Fee will be determined. Drainage issues be addressed as stated in the City Engineer*s letter. There will be private driveways for the two lots off the relocated cul*de<sac. H is the applicanf s responsibility to work with the Crystal Creek Homeowners* Association regarding the cost to use the private road as it exists. Address the back lot acreage issue by rearranging the lot lines. Move the tamporwy cul^le*sac to serve the two new lots and Lot 7. City Engineer is to review the stormwater management plan. Schroeder asked if the two new lots will be back lots. Van Zomeren stated that they are not back lots if the road is extended with a cuMe-sac. If it is extended with a 50* outlet, they are back lots. A cul-de-sac has to be shown on the plat in order to not require the back lot acreage. The applicant wiil have to decide the location of the cul-de-sac. The City would accept 50’ straight across the top. As long as both new lots have access on the new cul- de-sac where staff can measure the lot width to the starxlard for the zoning district, they would not be considered back lots. Winston asked if the cul-de-sac would be constructed or platted. Lindquist stated it only has to be platted. Winston asked where the black top will end. Lindquist stated there will be a private road coming from the present cul-de-sac in Crystal Creek to the two additional lots. McMillan asked what would trigger the physical construction of the cul-de-sac. Van Zomeren stated that a cul-de-sac would have to be constructed when Lot 7 is developed. McMillan stated she would like to review the Crystal Creek resolution regarding the cuhde-sac. Stoddard stated the cul-de-sac should be platted now. Kahler stated that Lot 7 will be landlocked. Schroeder stated that perhaps all the lots could be served by the cul-de-sac and asked how many driveways can be served by a cul-de-sac. Van Zomeren responded that as long as the lots can meet the lot width requirement, there is no restriction on the number of driveways from a cul-de-sac. Page 9 i