My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-1999 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
01-19-1999 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 2:49:50 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 2:43:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a <br />CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2948 <br />A RBSOLOTION 6RANTIH6 <br />PRELIHIHARY APPROVAL OF THB PROPOSED <br />CRYSTAL CREEK PLAT <br />FILE NO. 1457 <br />IfHEREASf Alan G. Carlson (hereinafter "the subdlvider") on March <br />22, 1991 filed a revised fornral subdivision application with the City for <br />approval of a 12-*lot residential plat of property legally described as <br />follows: <br />Exhibit A, attached, (hereinafter "the property") and} <br />ffBEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with <br />Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seg. and the City of Orono Zoning and <br />Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on March <br />18, 1991 and March 20, 1991 and the Council on April 8, 1991 at which times <br />all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the <br />opportunity to speak thereon; and <br />WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on April 8, 1991, the <br />Orono City Council considered the amended subdivision application of 12 <br />lots, noting the following findings of facti <br />1.The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural <br />Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of <br />contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. <br />2.The subdivision as.amended from the original 16-lot proposal finds <br />that each lot meets or exceeds the 2-acre minimum dry contiguous lot <br />area standards. <br />3.Each of the 12 lots meets the required lot width.to the rear of <br />the 50* front street setback line. <br />Page 1 of 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.