Laserfiche WebLink
;»#• « •*• • • <br />zoning Files #941, =94C & 1931 <br />August 14, 19B5 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />6. What £orf. o£ ovr.arshio is feasible for these tracts? Single or <br />joint? <br />7. What corr.bir.atien of boat storage is acceptable? <br />iHoatcv*Grl6f66^ini6r. cthonl^ <br />b) 1 hill over 16 feet in length only and 1 under <br />c) ^2 boats each ever 15 feet in length <br />16 fee <br />8. IS there a special placement or pa^ttern for dc=h_^«^^ <br />ti::«^r^%»?s?o?"h>°Thi!SUh^ro;erty - I h.ave enclosed the survey <br />to assist in your reviev. <br />a) limit on dock width <br />b) limit or. widths of boat sxips <br />dock location within 20 feet wid.-h <br />d) tracts cannot cualify for use of buoys in lagoon <br />9. Use of land tract; <br />users - nice, but how do you enforce, <br />c) other land use limits? <br />The Planning Cor.e.ission felt the scope -“j^s °nl Tell <br />conditional use pcrmiru riparian uses are best <br />construction, setbacks, etc. '”“0 5 dc..ling <br />^^e'lntttittti'^ttttiuticns drafted by staff <br />include the necessary CindinQS. <br />The total membership did not ail <br />the use of these tracts. ^^00^ the dry land <br />the four docks to one bo.nt over 10 p?, ' f^^ther recommended that <br />^rja^crt’Ta^ncr;rncn..^t;icts Jit^^u^ The- v^Vt't^^n^'co^^sent of the affected <br />cwno.r . <br />The minority cf tv., fit that ^ ‘UsU” t <br />unrcasonabic and untcur.de! Jiritai icn not b.lnccl O! S...C.1 co <br />The enclosed resolution:, h.ive houn dratted based or, the diroetives e£ <br />the majority opinio;;.