Laserfiche WebLink
K' <br />Zoning Files ^941, *946 & 3951 <br />August 14, 1985 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Tracts ?. & 0 have contained docks since the early 60's. Each c: <br />with the others, maintain a zero lot line setoack. Both doc.<s na <br />gach one soil boat over 16 feet stored for the su~nier season.^ <br />knov**iedce there has never been another boat Kept at these doc.ts. <br />& P are'the land tracts providing a parking space for each owner, <br />tc these tracts are via Dick Ogle's property to the south. <br />b) Donald C. Cook <br />Cook has owned Tract E, a riparian tract since 1979 or 1931. Tne <br />tract was originally owned by an adjacent land owner and when the subjec- <br />owner sold his homestead lot, the riparian tract was not includec in the <br />sale but sold indeoendently to Cook. The covenants governing the special <br />ownership combinations for the riparian tracts owned by adDacent lano <br />owners expired in January of 1965. <br />Cook has laaintained 1 boat over 16 feet in length at the zero <br />dock since his ownership. Cook does not own the contiguous land ._acw . <br />Dick Ogle owns Tract D. The land tracts serve as off-street parking ^ <br />car. Cook does not have sufficient dry land area to provide s-itabie <br />parking for one car. Cook is able to legally park on County Roat 19 bu- <br />this may not be an arrangement that the City would wish to encourage.^ <br />these non-conforming uses are to be approved by the City, their use rus-. i.. <br />no way pl«ice any unnecessary hazards or risks in the use of the properties <br />.or create nuisances for the surrounding property owners or tjie c^enerai <br />public. It would be preferable for Cook to acquire the use of Tract D -cr <br />off-street parking purposes but in light of the available parking on adja <br />c^nt County Road 19, it is difficult for the City t,o deny a conditional use <br />permit to the applicant because of safety factors si ice the docK nas been <br />used for the past five vears without mishap. Limits on the use c: appo-i- <br />canfs dock would result in an increase in safety - guarts to be picxed up <br />at public landing areas rather than encourage additional parking cn Coun.y <br />Road 19. <br />c) vTohn Thinmesh . , c , - e <br />Thinmesh is the current owner of recently combined Tracts S 6 *. <br />prooerty remained with the original owner/developer's famH y until 1. ••• <br />It was the request of a potential buyer to build a new dock that ccmmencec <br />this year long review process. Tract S has had a zero lot line cock .or <br />many vears. The applicant asks if this property could be ownce jointly <br />with another individual. I have explained that this review may establish <br />ii.T.its on the use of thtse docks so that joint ownership is impractica^i. <br />He understands our concern but also asks that the City consider the - ° . <br />adjacent owner could maintain 2 boats in excess of the 16 <br />not encroach on adjacent dock ateas or create hazards for navigatic.-. <br />lagoon. I suggested that the City would be vary of the potontiar to re.^. <br />or lease the second slip and add to the parking congestion problems wit..^n <br />the neighborhood. He advised tl'.at. this was not his intention but that ..e <br />had planned at some future date to acquire a collector type boat m exces.s <br />of 16 feet length. I advised Thimmesb to come back at that time tc amenu <br />k.is original conditional use pcrm.it per Council approval.