Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 26,1998 <br />(#2430 Paul Phillips, Continued) <br />GoetteiTmoveHrPctefsoa^econded, to senjiAppHcgfioh #2430,2140 Sixth Avenue <br />North, back to the Plnnninrl^mTftffnilo^^ review.^^OTE; Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />^ *(#13) #2431 ROGER OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE <br />RENEWAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4185 <br />Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2431,815 Partenwood Road, <br />and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4185. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />14) #2432 GREENFIELD CORPORATION, 4755/4775 BAYSTDE ROAD <br />EASEMENT/SUBDIVISION <br />Laurie Lur^deen, Greenfield Corporation, and Jim DeBerg, were present. <br />Van Zomeren sh(ed the Applicants are requesting a revision or amendmmt to the final plat <br />resolution to accommodate a private driveway easement over Lot 3 to^ovide access to <br />Lot 1. The private dnyeway easement does not comply with the ap^val resolution for the <br />final plat, which shows alKoutlot for all three lots along Bayside Rom. Van Zomeren stated <br />Staff is generally not in favoKof private driveway easements due/o the possible problems that <br />may result. <br />The Planning Commission recommended denial of a priv^casement and suggested that the <br />Applicant apply for a lot line rearrangembqt, which woqW require a lot width variance for <br />Lot 3. <br />Jim DeBerg, 1551 Hunter Lane, Medina, stated hi^Htad previously met with the property <br />owner and offered the private driveway easemem notVealizing that it was in conflict with <br />what was originally approved in the Resolution. DeBergt^ted he was later informed by the <br />building official that he could not have a pwate driveway Msqment. <br />Laurie Lundeen stated they were una\^e they could not grant a pK^te driveway easement. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated the City doe^ot officially recognize a private drivbway easement. <br />DeBergp remarked that even witiythe granting of the private driveway eascmen^lfte lot still <br />exceeds the minimum lot size <br />Van Zomeren stated a lot^dth variance would be needed in the case of a lot line <br />rearrangement for the i^iadle lot.