My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
10-16-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2023 12:19:41 PM
Creation date
3/21/2023 12:13:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />SEPTEMBER 18,2000 <br />(#2614 Joe and Sue Haus, Continued) <br />2. The building is located on a prq>erty without frontage on a road. Access to the property is <br />via an easement over the lot located to the northwest. The building is located well behind <br />all other residential structures along Bayside Road. <br />3. Natural vegetation adequately screens the building from view from adjacent structures. <br />Haus indicated he would like to keep the building for storage. Haus stated he does have the <br />support of his neighbors regarding this project. <br />Kluth inquired whether there are any wetlands on this property or what the hardship is for the <br />variance. <br />Haus stated it is an existing structure. <br />Hawn stated the hardship needs to be imposed by the land. <br />Haus conuncnted the land consists of different elevations which makes it difficult to locate or <br />access the building anywhere else on the property. <br />Hawn inquired whether it is possible for the Planning Commission to grant a variance to permit <br />the structure for a limited number of years. <br />Gaffron inquired what the life of the building is. <br />Haus stated he just put new 25 year shingles on the structure. <br />Gaffron stated something could be filed on the chain of title. <br />Hawn commented in her view the structure should be relocated off the lot line. Hawn indicated <br />she would not be in support of this application since this would be considered new <br />construction. <br />Haus inquired whether a variance would be granted for an accessory structure in front of the <br />existing residence. <br />Hawn stated the application could be tabled if the Applicant wished to review his options <br />regarding the location of the structure. <br />Hawn moved, Smith seconded, to table Application #2614, Joe and Sue Haus, <br />4485 Bayside Road, to allow the Applicant time to review his options. <br />VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />PAGE 28
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.