Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />February 21, 2023 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Erickson noted the mistake didn't get caught in the frame inspection. Ideally would have been caught <br />during framing. And so it's after -the -fact after everything's all done, we come up and say, well, it needs to <br />seven inches to the left. I guess knowing that and understanding there's a survey error is that enough <br />practical difficulty to let us to allow this this variance to go through? As the applicant pointed out if the <br />application would have been for 17.3 instead of 19 when we approved it, hindsight is 20/20. But it's not <br />that big of a distance. I was originally pretty harsh on this one, but as I think about it a little bit more, is <br />there some wiggle room here that we can understand this? <br />Bollis said it's not like they applied with the stairs in a different configuration. This happened. It wasn't <br />their fault it ended up being like this. It's not like they had a different configuration and decided to change <br />it. It wasn't intentionally done. I guess I would be in favor of leaving them. I don't see that it's harming <br />anyone. But I do agree with Mr. Libby. <br />Libby stated again the variance would need to be a material fact disclosed and fully transparent. I don't <br />favor remediation. <br />Erickson stated his belief that if it had been proposed that way the first time around it would have been <br />approved. <br />Bollis said he would move to approve LA 22-70 as applied. <br />Libby asked again that the non -conforming aspects of the stairway be fully disclosed in perpetuity, <br />because they'll never be corrected. <br />Nye said if the variance were to be approved, the resolution noting this action would be recorded against <br />the property. It would be able to be found and noted for any title or historical purposes associated with the <br />property. <br />Bollis moved, Kirchner seconded, to approve LA22-000070, 4085 Watertown Road after -the -fact <br />Variances. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. <br />3. LA23-000001 LECY BROS. HOMES & REMODELING - BRENDA KOEHNEN, 2617 <br />CASCO POINT ROAD, REQUESTS A HARDCOVER VARIANCE FOR THE <br />CONSTRUCTION OF A DECK. <br />City Planner Nye gave a presentation on the item, stating at 2617 Casco Point Road, the applicant is <br />proposing to construct a new deck on the west side of the home, serving the first floor and overlooking <br />the lake. The lot as it exists today is over on hardcover. This lot is tier one, which limits its hardcover to <br />25 percent of the lot. Currently, the lot is at 28.4 percent. The proposal is to construct a 288 square foot <br />deck partially over an existing patio. The proposal also includes the removal of a portion of the patio and <br />the removal of a flagstone walk. Through the removal of 104 square feet of hardcover and taking <br />advantage of the City's 100 square foot hardcover credit for the new deck, the site will go from 28.4 <br />percent hardcover, to 27.9. The hardcover credit offered by the City is a maximum of 100 square feet and <br />can be applied to permeable pavers, decks and other improvements where water can seep through. The <br />proposed deck meets the required setbacks. The applicant is requesting the hardcover variance because <br />Page 15 of 19 <br />