My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-18-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
09-18-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 4:21:23 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 4:17:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />AUGUST 21,2000 <br />(#2550 Charles Van Eeckhout, Continued) <br />April Bresner, 50 Apple Glen Road, expressed concerns with extension of the street since Apple <br />Glen Road is a narrower road and the added traffic. <br />Mary Ann Hansen, 64 Creekside Drive, Long Lake, stated it v^s her understanding this area was <br />part of a state refuge when she purchased her property three years ago. Hansen stated there <br />currently are signs denoting the area as a state re^ge, with a targe number of wildlife living in the <br />area. <br />Ken and Judy Bigelow, 32 Apple Glen Road, stated they were opposed to the e.xtension of the <br />road. <br />John Dunn, 20 South Brown Road, stated he owns the adjoining property to this development, <br />and it is his impression the Applicant has done quite a bit of ditching on the property. Dunn also <br />expressed concern regarding the small size of the lots. <br />April Bresner questioned whether once an area is designated as a wetland, regardless if a ditch is <br />constructed and the area is now deemed dry buildable, if that area is still considered to be a <br />wetland. <br />Stoddard stated there are many standards that go into designating an area as wetland, with the <br />presence of water and flora being the two primary criteria used in determining whether the area <br />should be considered a wetland. Stoddard stated the characteristics of the land can change. <br />Stoddard stated the DNR can designate certain areas as wetlands, with the City of Orono <br />protecting additional wetland area beyond the DNR designations. <br />Bergh noted diis area has never been delineated as a wetland. <br />Weinberger stated the original delineation for this area was revised, with the area in question not <br />being designated as a wetland. <br />Hawn commented she has some concerns regarding the sand and fill having been found. Hawn <br />inquired if City Staff has any information concerning where that fill may have come from. <br />Weinberger stated the only information the City has is that it may have come from the excavation <br />of the creekbed area. Weinberger stated he is not aware of when the area may have been filled or <br />where the area was filled. <br />Hawn commented it is her understanding this area was wetland in 1998 <br />Dunn stated he has seen backhoes and tractors at various times in that area, which in his opinion <br />was done in an attempt to lower the water table in that area and to create a buildable area. <br />Hawn stated she does not know whether that is in fact the case. <br />Dunn stated from a lay person’s perspective, something has occurred in the area to have lowered <br />the water table from what it was in 1998. <br />PAGES <br />ku&iii
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.