Laserfiche WebLink
f ---- <br />rt|i <br />The recent flurry of neighborhood concerns regarding the dock lots has raised many issues related <br />to this application. These issues can be summarized as follows: (From 4/13/00 memo) <br />1.General neighborhood resident concerns about parking on Co. Rd. 19, overnight stays on <br />boats, lighting, security alarms, and a general expansion of a non-conforming situation with <br />the concurrent perception of increased activity. <br />2.Non-resident dock lot owners concerns about parking needs and the need to provide <br />amenities such as lighting and security alarms to make the dock lots usable. <br />3.Resident dock lot owners negative response to City’s suggestion that they permanently tie <br />the dock lots to their neighborhood homestead properties. <br />4.Lack of clarity as to existence and impact of existing easements and covenants dating back <br />to the 1950’s that may impose limits on use or require maintenance of access. <br />Staff expects area residents will be in attendance to voice their specific concerns a out this <br />application. Also see attached letter from neighbors. <br />Mike Gaffron has written a letter to state the City’s position on several of the issues raised by <br />concerned neighbors. It is attached as Exhibit B. <br />Comments from the adjacent property owners and there attorney are attache_dfoUowing the gxhibif? <br />noted on page 1 of this report. Note, most of the comments were received earlier thi$ V^ar and_aie <br />in reference to the conditional use request that has been withdrawn.. <br />Options for Planning Commission Action <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Table for additional information <br />Recommend approval with condition <br />Recommend denial, stating reasons <br />Other action <br />ti257t Jim Ginther and Doug Alt <br />2739 Shady\¥Ood Road <br />A/tir the Fact Variance <br />August 2L 2000 <br />pag*-3 <br />■J