Laserfiche WebLink
G <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 14,2000 <br />(#254<l Bradley Hoyt, continued) <br />Barrett statedXpublic hearing had been scheduled with the Planning Commission on Janua^ <br />19,2000. NeitheS^. Hoyt nor representatives on his behalf appeared at the January 19* public <br />hearing. <br />Mr. Sheridan stated Mr. HoyH^orepared to submit a complete application to present at the <br />February 28,2000 meeting of thccouncil. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated a new public hearingV^th the Planning Commission ma> be required. <br />Barrett stated a public hearing would be required toYaj^w the variance request. <br />Kelley stated the earliest this item could potentially return to^hqCity Council w-^uld be the last <br />meeting in March. <br />Mr. Sheridan stated he would be willing to draft a letter to extend the dei <br />proceed with the variance request. <br />to permit time to <br />Kelley moved, and Peterson seconded, to continue this item to 5A. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />5. #2550 Charles Van Eeckhout, 120 Brown Road South - Subdivision for PUnned <br />Residential Development <br />Mr. Van Eeckhout was present with representative John Bergh of Loucks and Associates. <br />Weinberger explained the issue facing this application was that the dry buildable acreage <br />available totaled 13.7 acres where 14 acres are required for 7 lots. As plaimed, the subdivision <br />did not meet city requirements of 2 acres per lot. The Planning Commission recommended <br />denying the application based on the total drj* buildable not meeting the minimum requirement <br />of 2 acres dry buildable per lot in the RRIB zoning district. <br />Kellogg stated that no trail or sidewalk was planned with the recommended 50 foot road width. <br />Sansevere asked if the applicant had considered a reduction to 6 lots. Vari Eeckhout responded <br />that he would prefer 7 lots and felt that would be attainable once soil borings were done in the <br />spring. <br />' 1 <br />uuiifiaaii