My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
08-21-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 4:22:49 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 4:17:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 2000 <br />(HI2400 Mark and Arlene Ploen, Continued) <br />Weinberger stated the road would never be built up to the residence. Weinberger stated the <br />County could elect to condemn the property. <br />Hawn commented the two new lots would meet lot size but do not comply with the 140 foot <br />width front yard setback. <br />Stoddard Inquired whether there were any precedents similar to this situation. <br />Weinberger stated this lot line rearrangement is not increasing the housing density in this area, <br />but would allow the Applicant to create two lots meeting the one acre zoning requirement. <br />Weinberger stated these two lots would continue to be considered two housing units. <br />Hawn stated in her view meeting the required lot size is an important factor to consider in this <br />application. <br />Smith inquired whether the Applicants are agreeable to the other conditions recommended by <br />City Staff. <br />Mr. Ploen indicated they are agreeable to the conditions. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Smith moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2400, <br />4345/4365 North Shore Drive, I Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement, subject <br />to the five conditions outlined in the January 12,2000 Planner's Report and further <br />subject to removal of the garage located closest to Lot B. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Mrs. Ploen inquired when the garage would need to be removed. <br />Weinberger indicated six months from the time of approval would be fine. <br />(#3) #2550 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH, SUBDIVISION FOR <br />PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. 7:32 pjn. • 0:23 p.m. <br />Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Charles Van Eeckhout, Applicant, was present, along with John Berg, Loucks & Associates. <br />Weinberger stated this application was reviewed at the November Planning Commission meeting, <br />where the application was denied due to the number of issues to be resolved and concerns <br />regarding DNR permits for sewer and driveway extension "'ross Long Lake Creek, a protected <br />wateoMay. <br />The Applicant has submitted a revised plan for the subdivision to create an open space south <br />of ine creek, which eliminates any concerns with crossing the creek as well as concerns <br />regarding bridging and extension of the sewer line across the creek. The DNR has requested <br />lh6 developer dedicate a conservation easement alon j the south boundary of the property to <br />help preserve the natural area along the Luce Line Trail. <br />As it relates to sewer access to the Fox Ridge neighborhood, the best option would be to hav <br />Page 8 <br />f
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.