My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
08-21-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 4:22:49 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 4:17:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15,1999 <br />(#2550 Charles Van Eeckhout, Continued) <br />corridor will not front any building sites, no parking Is needed and a 24 foot lane is the same as a <br />highway lane and should provide adequate driving space. The additional four feet adds little <br />functionability to the roadway and would result in the loss of trees as well as add to the hardcover. <br />Van Eeckhout commented the properties can be served by driveways with a grade of seven percent <br />or less. Van Eeckhout stated the sewer should be extended across the Luce Line as this is the <br />most economical approach. <br />Van Eeckhout remarked that these planning issues can be dealt with after preliminary plat approval <br />and prior to final plat. Van Eeckhout requested that the Planning Commission approve his <br />application subject to the conditions outlined by the Zoning Administrator. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Chair Hawn stated she would be happy to comment on the plan in general, but with the location of <br />the road being uncertain at this time, she would have a hard time approving the preliminary plat as <br />proposed. Hawn commented she would also like to see the DNR issues resolved as well prior to <br />approval being given. <br />Stoddard commented the Planning Commission can provide some direction to the Applicant on how <br />ro proceed. Stoddard stated in his view this land does not have the same uniqueness and <br />capability to be developed as the proposal by The Bancor Group. Stoddard stated in his opinion the <br />proposed density for this development is too high and needs to be reduced somewhat, with the <br />other issues needing to be addressed further with City Staff. <br />Nygard stated he is in agreement with Stoddard and has some concerns regarding the issues <br />relating to the creek. <br />Smith commented In her view she is unsure whether this property meets the qualifications for a <br />PRD. noting she also has some concerns regarding the creek crossing and the sewer extension <br />under the Luce Line. Smith noted that the Luce Line In this area is not easily assessible. Smith <br />encouraged the Applicant to continue to work with City Staff to resolve these issues. <br />Chair Hawn inquired whether the wetlands would be subject to some type of conservation easement. <br />Van Eeckhout stated he would be willing to discuss that Issue with City Staff to see what they <br />think is best for this area. <br />Chair Hawn expressed a concern that some of the lots are too small and should be made larger by <br />incorporating some of the other dry buildabie land that is available. <br />Van Eeckhout stated he Is attempting to preserve the wooded area as much as possible. <br />Lindquist concurred that somt* of the lots are too small in his opinion. <br />Va:» Eeckhout commented with a PRD the overall density is what is considered. <br />Lindquist stated the Planning Comrjiciion has not a^,>proved density less than one acre in the past, <br />and noted he would not be in favor of doing sc in this case. <br />Van Eeckhout remarked that this development is adjacent to Long Lake, which has smaller size lots, <br />Page 18
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.