My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
08-21-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 4:22:49 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 4:17:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNE 19, 2000 <br />iU2S92 MIKE HILBELINK, CONTINUED) <br />Hawn stated in her view the Planning Commission typically docs not permit that. <br />Hilbclink stated that would require the removal of the pine trees in that area. <br />Lindquist stated the trees could remain but the area would just be platted as a SO foot outlot in <br />the event this lot is developed further in the future. <br />Hilbclink stated they did not prefer that option and have elected to only subdivide the property into <br />two lots. <br />Gaffron indicated the Planning Commission could request the property' owners place a covenant <br />on the property preventing it from being further developed in the future. <br />Hilbclink stated he would have a problem with a covenant in the event the owner of Lot 1 in the <br />future decided to subdivide. <br />Lindquist stated he has a concern that someone in the future will want to subdivide this property <br />further and will not have drivewav access. <br />Hawn indicated it would be difftcult to subdivide the back lot under the current City Codes. <br />Hilbclink pointed out that further subdivision of this property may impact the septic sites. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Weinberger noted he has been contacted by a party' interested in purchasing the entire piece of <br />property. <br />Hilbclink stated they have been in contact with that individual, noting the party did have the <br />chance to make an offer on the property. <br />Lindquist inquired whether they were okay with the additional 10 feet. <br />Hilbclink stated that would be acceptable as long as it did not impact the septic sites <br />Weinberger noted a minimal amount of grading is required on this property since the driveway <br />already e.xists. <br />Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application ff2592, <br />John Vogt and Mike Hilbclink, 350 Stubbs Bay Road North, subject to the platting of a <br />40 foot outlot, the standard drainage and utility easements being dedicated, and the <br />planting of additional landscaping along the driveway once the actual location of the <br />building pads and driveway is determined. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />PAGE 17 <br />*1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.