My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
08-21-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 4:22:49 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 4:17:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNE 19,2000 <br />SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />(#3) #2588 ROBERT PIEPER, 3995 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - PROPOSED SUBDIVISION <br />RESULTING IN TWO ’A ACRE LOTS, 7:05 p.m. - 7:17 p.in. <br />Robert Pieper, Applicant, was present. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to subdivide the Sandy Beach property, consisting of <br />1.3 acre, into two residential lots. Currently there are six cabins on the property being used as <br />rental dwellings The Applicant is proposing to remove all the cabins and parking areas in order <br />to build a home on Lot 1 and sell Lot 2 as a residential building site. <br />Weinberger stated a portion of the property is located within a Hennepin County right-of-way, <br />with Hennepin County having an easement over that area and will be dedicated on the final plat <br />as a public roadway. <br />The Applicant has recently purchased the property and would like to create two one-half acre <br />lots. The property is located on a 90 degree curve along County Road 19 (North Shore Drive) <br />and driveway access to both lots independently is not the best option. The Applicant is proposing <br />a shared driveway access into Lot 2 immediately to the cast of the property line. Locating the <br />driveway access any further to the west would result it the driveway being very close to the sharp <br />concern and raising some safety concerns. Both the City Engineer and the Public Works Director <br />have reviewed the location of the driveway, with this option being recommended by both. <br />Weinberger stated the main issue regarding this property relates to a drainage issue that is long <br />outstanding. Drainage from the north of North Shore Drive is blocked due to a culvert that was <br />plugged. This culvert has become plugged over the years and will need to be cleaned out to allow the <br />water to flow back across to the Sandy Beach property. Weinberger stated the property will need to be <br />regraded in order to avoid all the water runoff from going across the parking lot, which is a proposed <br />building site. The City Engineer has reviewed thi< site id is recommending continuing an existing <br />ditchway along the County Road to divert the flows into an existing drainageway between the culvert <br />and the road. The City Engineer feels a 20 foot drainage and utility easement along North Shore Drive <br />would be adequate to handle the regrading and the drainage and would also help save the building site <br />on Lot 2. This drainageway would also eliminate the ponding in the area that occurs foliowring a large <br />rainfall. Weinberger stated prior to this application proceeding forward, a revised grading and <br />drainage plan will need to be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. <br />Weinberger stated both lots do meet the mini* turn requirements for properties located in the <br />one-acre zoning district. Lot width for Lot 2 is required to be 100 feet along the Count>’ Road, <br />with the proposed lot width being 188.5 feet. Weinberger noted the lot width for lakeshore properties <br />is measured at the structured setback from the lake, which is 170 feet. Pjth lots are <br />one-half acre dry buildabic, w ith one portion of the property being lor aed in a low area but <br />outside of the proposed building sites. <br />City Staff believes that drivewavs »nd tcosonably sized houses .ould be constructed on both lots <br />that would meet the requirements for hardcover. Structural co.erage may be an issue since these <br />PAGE 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.