My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-2000 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
08-21-2000 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 4:22:49 PM
Creation date
3/16/2023 4:17:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />JULY 17,2000 <br />(REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES, Conlinued) <br />that he will not be held hostage by the complaints of the neighbors on this application, and <br />suggested the neighbors attempt to reach some t>pc of reasonable solution with the Country Club. <br />Lindquist commented in his view the neighbors may not be ready to reach a solution at this time. <br />Weinberger stated the Van Eck Hout application has been referred back to the Planning <br />Commission in an effort to find alternate access to the subdivision, with another 60 day extension <br />being granted on tlic application. Weinberger indicated the Applicant will be submitted a revised <br />plan. <br />It was noted that a representative of the Planning Commission was unable to attend the <br />June 26, 2000 City Council meeting. <br />(«I2) SELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ON <br />JULY 24,2000 AND AUGUST 14,2000 <br />July 24 - Smith August 1 4 - Kluth <br />(«I0) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION <br />Smith inquired whether there were any other instructions regarding the cameras. <br />Gaffron indicated thev would like to have the cameras returned within a month. <br />Kluth reported the joint meeting with the Long Lake Planning Commission went well, with <br />Long Lake requesting that Orono provide them with a list of common concerns. <br />Smith commcp*'^ 4 it was her understanding they had agreed to share agendas with each other. <br />Gaffron stated it is hi« belief they arc currently providing Long Lake with the agendas for the <br />Orono Planning Com •.•is'; ion and City Council meetings. <br />Kluth stated it was the goal of both cities to improve relations between the two Planning <br />Commissions regardless of what happens with the merger and to discuss issues of concern and <br />common interest relating to various items, such as the new Highway 12 corridor. <br />Lindquist inquired if any plans had been decided upon regarding the old Long Lake Ford <br />building. <br />Gaffron stated to his knowledge a decision has not been reached regarding that building. <br />Kluth stated Long Lake was also going to include the Orono Planning Commission membera on <br />their mailing list for their cit>' newsletter. <br />Smith commented she would like to sec it included in their packets if possible. <br />PAGE 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.